Eldon Housing Association Limited
Home care, Croydon
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
Eldon Housing Association Limited: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in October 2023, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 3 times since 2015. Rated Good in 2015 and 2018, then Requires improvement in October 2023.
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement. The latest rating was published about 3 years ago.
How it compares locally
- One of 13 Requires improvement home care services in Croydon, out of 88 with a rating.
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 5 October 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Eldon Housing Association Limited is an 'extra care housing' service. Extra care housing services provide personal care to people living in their own flats within housing schemes. Eldon Housing Association Limited provided personal care to people in two buildings in Croydon: Lindsay Court and Westdene. The service provides support to older people, some of whom are living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 44 people using the service.
Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.
What inspectors found
Risks to people were not adequately assessed and plans to mitigate and manage risks were not sufficiently detailed, instructive and personalised. Medicines management was not always safe. This put people at risk of potential harm. However, we found no evidence anyone had been harmed and people and their relatives said they felt the service was safe. There were systems and process in place to protect people from abuse and improper treatment. There were enough staff to meet people's needs and new staff were recruited safely. Infection prevention and control in both schemes was good. Staff learned lessons when something went wrong.
People's needs and choices were assessed and their needs and preferences were met. However, their assessments and care plans did not contain sufficiently detailed and person-centred information. Despite this, staff knew people's needs and preferences well and provided them with the right care and support. New staff received induction training and all staff completed regular training and were well supported to do their jobs. Staff supported people to eat and drink enough and maintain a balanced diet and worked with other agencies to provide people with consistent, effective and timely care. Staff supported people to be active and to live healthier lives and access healthcare services and support. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
Read the full summary
People's assessments and care plans did not contain sufficient information about their equality, diversity and human rights or any information about any protected characteristics they may have. However, staff knew people well and understood and respected their diversity. People were well treated, and staff were friendly, kind and caring. People and their relatives were involved in their assessments, planning their care and reviews of their care and support, and were encouraged to participate in making decisions about their care. People and their relatives felt they were always treated with respect and dignity. People were supported to be as independent as possible.
People's care and support was not recorded and planned in a personalised way and people's individual
communication needs had not been sufficiently recorded in their assessments and care plans. However, staff communicated with people in ways they could understand because they knew people's individual ways of communication well. People were supported to maintain relationships, follow their interests and participate in activities. There was a complaint policy and procedure in place and complaints were dealt with appropriately and to people's satisfaction. People could be provided with end-of-life care and support if required.
The provider's quality assurance systems and processes were not always effective. The provider's audits had not identified the issues we found during our inspection. There was a positive culture and the care and support people received was inclusive and empowering and achieved good outcomes for them. The provider, managers and staff understood their duty to communicate openly and honestly when something went wrong. The provider engaged people, their relatives, and staff in the development of the service. There were systems and processes to support continuous learning and improving care. Staff worked well in partnership with other services, organisations and agencies to provide people's care and support.
Questions to ask the service
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 5 October 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 5 October 2023. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 5 October 2023. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- The last rating is 3 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
Contact and registration details
| Address | The Office, 21 Bardsley Court, 174-176 Selhurst Road, South Norwood, London, SE25 6LX |
|---|---|
| Neighbourhood | South Norwood, Croydon |
| Phone | 020 8668 9861 |
| Website | www.eldonhousing.co.uk |
| Registered manager | Linda Pither |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 5 inspection reports, latest 5 October 2023 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Eldon Housing Association Limited |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | IP23431R (opens Companies House) |
Nearest alternatives
- G KJD Care Home care, 0.3 miles awayGood
- – HCC Care & Support Home care, 0.4 miles awayNot yet rated
- G Top Carers Nursing and Domiciliary Care Agency Home care, 0.5 miles awayGood
- – Green Apple Healthcare Services Ltd Home care, 0.6 miles awayNot yet rated
- – Orchid Supported Homes Home care, 0.6 miles awayNot yet rated
Getting help from London Borough of Croydon
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Croydon
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0208 726 6500
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Eldon Housing Association Limited provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Eldon Housing Association Limited.
- When was Eldon Housing Association Limited last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Eldon Housing Association Limited was published on 5 October 2023.
- Who runs Eldon Housing Association Limited?
- Eldon Housing Association Limited is run by Eldon Housing Association Limited.
- What is Eldon Housing Association Limited's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 5 October 2023.