Go Gentle Care

There were robust recruitment practices in place and sufficient staff levels to meet people's needs.

People received their medicines safely. Staff received appropriate training on the safe administration of medicines. This together with appropriate supervision and monitoring meant when required people received their medicines safely and staff had clear guidance to follow.

People said communications from the office were good and they were informed if their care workers were going to be late.

The provider ensured that all their staff received appropriate training and supervision. Staff told us they felt well supported. This included understanding and how to manage best practice for infection control and the use of personal protective equipment [PPE].

There were systems in place to ensure that accidents, incidents and risks were appropriately recorded and included details of preventive strategies used by the service to reduce the likelihood of events occurring in the future.

Assessments were thorough and expected outcomes were identified. Support plans were reviewed and updated as people's needs changed. People were supported by staff who knew them well and were able to identify people's likes and dislikes. They were supported to eat and drink according to their dietary requirements taking into consideration people's preferences.

People told us they received good quality care from kind, caring and regular staff. People and their relatives said that consistency and continuity of regular staff was important to them.

People told us they were treated with dignity and respect. This was echoed by people's relatives. They told

us staff had the right skills to deliver appropriate care and support. Staff were able to communicate with people well. Information was provided in various formats where required.

People and their relatives were confident that any concerns would be addressed appropriately and resolved by the registered manager. They told us the registered manager welcomed feedback.

People and the relatives we spoke with told us they thought the service was well led and that they were very happy with the support they received.

There were effective systems in place to monitor the quality of the service provided to people which ensured good governance. Technology was used effectively by the provider to ensure people were informed promptly about potentially missed or late calls. The service had systems in place to notify the appropriate authorities where concerns were identified. The culture of the service was positive, open and person centred.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk