Rated Care Homes

Enabling Others Limited

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Good in 2022, most recently Good in June 2026.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 83%

    of rated home care services in Leicestershire are Good or Outstanding (85% across the East Midlands, 88% across England).

Enabling Others Limited: inspection record

Home care, Leicestershire

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Enabling Others Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: No Place Like Home Midlands Ltd (Good, 0.7 miles away) and Village Homecare (Good, 0.9 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Westminster Homecare Limited – Leicester Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    No Place Like Home Midlands Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Village Homecare Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Community Careline NWL Ltd Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. G
    Karing Hands Care Good, 1.5 miles away

See all home care services in Leicestershire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 June 2026 (assessment visit 23 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 8-14 April 2026. This assessment was announced.

Enabling Others Limited is a supported living service which also provides homecare to adults with learning disabilities, mental health and autistic people. For this report, we only assessed the supported living provision for this service. At the time of the assessment there were 7 people using the service. Not everyone who used the service received the regulated activity personal care. CQC only assesses where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations relating to person-centred care, consent, safe care and treatment, good governance, staffing and fit and proper persons employed. We undertook this assessment to assess if the provider had made sufficient improvements against the warning notice we served in response to these breaches of regulations. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

This service has been in Special Measures since 17 September 2025. The provider demonstrated improvements that have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found people received care in accordance with this guidance and care workers and staff.

People were kept safe by staff that had knowledge and understanding of their responsibilities to protect people from harm or abuse. They knew the signs to recognise abuse and the procedure to report any concerns internally of externally. People received their medicines as prescribed, and the management of medicines was safe. The provider had a learning culture where staff understood, and managed risks and people were kept safe. Risks were assessed and regularly reviewed to ensure measures remained effective and appropriate. People were supported to take positive risks where this enhanced their quality of life. Staff understood people’s emotional communication and responded effectively to signs of distress, anxiety and frustration. Leaders and staff followed the least restrictive options to keep people safe and ensured lessons were learnt and shared through de-brief processes. People were supported to understand and maintain their tenancies, and staff supported them to ensure environments were safe, suitable and well maintained. Staff were deployed to meet people’s needs and keep them safe, and were supported through effective induction, supervision, appraisal and training to provide effective support to people.
People had choices about how they wanted their day-to-day care delivered and staff respected their decisions. People’s care and support reflected their choices, preferences, personalities, needs and individuality. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy and were supported to plan and shop for their meals where appropriate. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff ensured people had choice and control and consented to their care. They followed processes to ensure those important to people, and those involved in their care, took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity. People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People were supported to identify and achieve meaningful goals and aspirations, including hobbies and interests, and enabled to be as independent as possible. Staff encouraged and supported people to be a part of their local communities. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. The provider had reviewed their overall governance arrangements and made significant improvements to ensure robust and effective systems were in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service. They demonstrated they had learnt lessons and were committed to maintaining high standards of care and continuing to develop the service. Staff supported the provider’s values of people being in control and at the centre of their care. They were committed to enabling people to achieve the best possible outcomes from their care and support.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm. The[MP1] provider was previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, fit and proper persons and staffing. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to consent to care and treatment. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to person-centred care. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

Ratings by service

The Care Quality Commission rates each kind of service at this location separately.

Ratings by service for Enabling Others Limited
ServiceRatingDate SafeEffectiveCaringResponsiveWell-led
Homecare Good Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
Supported Living Good Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Oscar Makoni
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 14 December 2022. Latest assessment published 8 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
12401902 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Leicestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Enabling Others Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Enabling Others Limited.
When was Enabling Others Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Enabling Others Limited was published on 8 June 2026.
Who runs Enabling Others Limited?
Enabling Others Limited is run by Enabling Others Limited.
What is Enabling Others Limited's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
01283 553072
Address
Unit 9, Phoenix Park, Telford Way, Stephenson Industrial Estate, Coalville, LE67 3HB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: No Place Like Home Midlands Ltd (Good, 0.7 miles away) and Village Homecare (Good, 0.9 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Westminster Homecare Limited – Leicester Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    No Place Like Home Midlands Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Village Homecare Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Community Careline NWL Ltd Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. G
    Karing Hands Care Good, 1.5 miles away

See all home care services in Leicestershire