Rated Care Homes

FitzRoy Supported Living - Uckfield

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 14 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 72 of 80

    rated home care services in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

FitzRoy Supported Living - Uckfield: inspection record

Home care, East Sussex

Rated Good in August 2025, up from Requires improvement.

FitzRoy Supported Living - Uckfield: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 August 2025 (assessment visit 8 May 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

FitzRoy Supported Living Uckfield is a supported living service providing personal care to 4 adults with a learning disability and/or associated conditions. People lived independently in bungalows that were rented from a housing association. Staff worked from an office that was above two of the bungalows. Not everyone living in these bungalows received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was carried out between 16 May and 13 June 2025. We visited the service on 16 and 21 May 2025. The service specialised in the care of people with a learning disability and autistic people. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

This assessment was undertaken to review any improvements from the last inspection completed in October 2019 when the service was rated Requires Improvement. At this assessment further improvements were noted, and the service is now rated Good. Improvements included the handling of complaints and recording discussions surrounding end of life decisions. The service mainly used electronic records, problems with the internet connection and system navigation caused some issues and delays in accessing and completing records. However, staff knew people very well, so impact from this was low although staff were frustrated with the delays caused.

Staff focussed on a very person-centred approach to care and support. They put people, their views and choices at the centre of everything they did. Everyone was supported to share their views and aspirations. People’s dignity, privacy and human rights were maintained. Staff recognised any sign of distress or anxiety in people and responded effectively. For example, one person was unsure about the inspector being in the communal areas of the bungalow. Staff responded quickly providing reassurances and ensuring they felt safe.

People were supported to have enjoyable and meaningful lives. Contact with family and friends was given a high priority, valued and promoted.

Staff and people benefited from an open and positive culture in the service. The service learned from incidents changing and improving practice when needed. People were supported by a team of staff who knew them well and worked well together. Staff felt valued, undertook regular training and received supervision. Quality audits and reviews were used to monitor and improve the service. There was a stable and effective leadership team in place.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good.

    At this assessment the rating has remained Good.This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.At our last assessment we rated this key question Good.

    At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement.

    At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement.

    At this assessment the rating has changed to Good.This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Melanie Cottrell
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 4 December 2019. Latest assessment published 29 August 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
FitzRoy SupportBrand: Elizabeth Fitzroy Support
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02699902 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
1011290

FitzRoy Support runs 22 services in England, 7 of them in the South East. 16 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by FitzRoy Support

  1. G
    Bainbridge Close Good. Home care, Norfolk, East of England
  2. G
    Brookview Good. Care home, Coventry, West Midlands
  3. G
    Dalvington/The Oaks Good. Care home, Worcestershire, West Midlands
  4. G
    Donec Mews Good. Care home, Hampshire

See all 22 services run by FitzRoy Support

Getting help from East Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does FitzRoy Supported Living - Uckfield provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for FitzRoy Supported Living - Uckfield.
When was FitzRoy Supported Living - Uckfield last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for FitzRoy Supported Living - Uckfield was published on 29 August 2025.
Who runs FitzRoy Supported Living - Uckfield?
FitzRoy Supported Living - Uckfield is run by FitzRoy Support. It runs 22 services in England, 7 of them in the South East.
What is FitzRoy Supported Living - Uckfield's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 August 2025.