Rated Care Homes

Always Take Care Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 8 of 12

    rated home care services in Rutland are rated Good, like this one.

Always Take Care Limited: inspection record

Home care, Rutland

Rated Good in June 2026.

Always Take Care Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Emma Way Associates Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. O
  3. G
    Yourlife (Oakham) Good, 5 miles away
  4. G
    Community Support Services Good, 5 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Rutland

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 June 2026 (assessment visit 10 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

Always Take Care Limited is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care, to adults in their own homes in the community. The service specialises in providing 24-hour live-in care staff. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks relating to personal hygiene and eating. Where this is the case, we also consider any wider social care provided.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

This service supports older people who are living in their own homes. At the time of our assessment, 24people were using the service.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 16 June 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

The provider demonstrated a positive learning culture where incidents, concerns and feedback were reviewed and used to improve the quality of care provided. Staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities and were confident in recognising, reporting and responding to concerns to keep people safe from abuse and avoidable harm. A staff member said, “We immediately record [incidents] on our [digital system] under ‘raise concerns’ documenting the incident accurately. We record date, time, location, factual description, action taken, witnesses as well as information [to] the office and getting their advice and input.”

Risk assessments reflected people's individual support needs. Some care records did not consistently include detailed information relating to specific healthcare needs; however, staff demonstrated a good understanding of people's needs and had taken prompt and appropriate action when people became unwell. People's home environments were assessed to ensure they were suitable and safe for the delivery of care.

The provider ensured there were sufficient numbers of appropriately skilled, experienced and trained staff to meet people's needs through live-in care arrangements. Staff received induction, training, supervision and ongoing support to carry out their roles effectively. Recruitment processes were robust and helped ensure only suitable staff were employed. Medicines were managed safely, with clear procedures for administration, recording, storage and monitoring within people's homes.

People's needs were assessed before care commenced, and care plans reflected their preferences, routines and support requirements. A staff member told us, “I am given access to the person’s care plan on [the digital system] before arriving at the person’s home, giving me time to read through and understand.” Staff monitored people's health and wellbeing and worked with healthcare professionals when concerns or changes in needs were identified. A visiting health care professional told us, “Both management and carers were excellent. Communication was always open and responsive. Staff and managers were always quick to get in touch with myself or other healthcare professionals when needed and took on board the advice given.”

Staff understood the principles of consent and supported people to make decisions about their care wherever possible. Care was person-centred and tailored to people's individual needs and preferences. People and, where appropriate, their relatives were actively involved in planning and reviewing care. The provider sought feedback from people using the service and used this information to improve care and people’s outcomes. The provider promoted equality, diversity and inclusion, ensuring people received fair and equitable care and support.

There was a clear vision and positive culture within the service, focused on delivering high-quality, person-centred live-in care. The provider’s vision and values statement included ‘Our values come from caring and providing care that counts, that makes people feel independent and empowered in their own home.’ Managers were approachable, responsive and committed to continuous improvement. A staff member told us, “I enjoy working for [Always Take Care Limited] as they make you feel part of a family. They give amazing support and they are just a phone call away. They go above and beyond in looking after us and their clients.”

Governance and quality assurance systems were effective in monitoring service performance. Audits, feedback, incident reviews and oversight processes were used to support learning and improve outcomes for people. The provider demonstrated a commitment to innovation and learning, ensuring the service continued to develop and respond to the changing needs of people receiving care.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Bridget Hayward
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 20 June 2019. Latest assessment published 25 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07151353 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Rutland County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Always Take Care Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Always Take Care Limited.
When was Always Take Care Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Always Take Care Limited was published on 25 June 2026.
Who runs Always Take Care Limited?
Always Take Care Limited is run by Always Take Care Limited.
What is Always Take Care Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 25 June 2026.

Contact

Address
Office 5, Building 1C, Uppingham Gate, Ayston Road, Uppingham, Oakham, LE15 9NY Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Emma Way Associates Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. O
  3. G
    Yourlife (Oakham) Good, 5 miles away
  4. G
    Community Support Services Good, 5 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Rutland