I Say Supported Living Services Limited
- Home care
- Registered since 2014
- Chatham, Medway, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
8 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
25 of 42
rated home care services in Medway are rated Good, like this one.
I Say Supported Living Services Limited: inspection record
Rated Good in March 2019.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Caremark (Dartford, Gravesham & Medway) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Scott Care's Medway Branch Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
- RI London Care (Rochester) Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Everycare (Medway/Swale) Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
- – Victory Locum Limited Kent Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 19 March 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
About the service: This service provides personal care to people living with Autism and/or Learning Disabilities in Medway, Maidstone and the surrounding areas. There were 24 people receiving personal care at the time of this inspection.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People's experience of using this service: People felt safe with staff. People felt included in planning their care. People's rights and their dignity and privacy were respected. People were supported to live the lifestyle of their choice. People told us they were listened to by the management of the service.
People could involve relatives or others who were important to them when they chose the care they wanted.
People were involved in talking about their personal safety in the community and in their home. This included giving people information about using the internet safely, reporting bullying or harassment and eating and drinking healthy.
Care plans had been developed to assist staff to meet people's needs. The care plans were consistently reviewed and updated. Care plans told people's life story, recorded who the important relatives and friends were in people's lives and explained what lifestyle choices people had made. Care planning informed staff what people could do independently, what skills people wanted to develop and what staff needed to help people to do.
Staff were deployed in the right numbers to meet people's needs and choices. People had a say in which staff supported them and how they were recruited. The registered manager accompanied new staff to introduce them to people. If people did not get on with new staff, they could tell the registered manager who would offer to change their care staff.
Health and safety policies and management plans were implemented by staff to protect people from harm. The provider trained staff so that they understood their responsibilities to protect people from harm. Staff were encouraged and supported to raise any concerns they may have.
Incidents and accidents were recorded and checked or investigated by the registered manager to see what steps could be taken to prevent these happening again.
People were often asked if they were happy with the care they received. The care offered was inclusive and based on policies about Equality, Diversity and Human Rights. People, their relatives and health care professionals had the opportunity to share their views about the service either face-to-face, by telephone, or by using formal feedback forms.
Complaints made by people or their relatives were taken seriously and thoroughly investigated.
The registered manager recruited staff with relevant experience and the right attitude to work with people who had learning disabilities. Recruitment policies were in place. Safe recruitment practices had been followed before staff started working at the service.
New staff and existing staff were given an induction and on-going training which included information specific to the people's needs in the service. Staff were deployed in a planned way, with the correct training, skills and experience to meet people's needs.
There were policies and procedures in place for the safe administration of medicines. Staff followed these policies and had been trained to administer medicines safely.
Staff supported people to maintain a balanced diet and monitor their nutritional health. People had access to GPs and their health and wellbeing was supported by prompt referrals and access to medical care if they became unwell. Good quality records were kept to assist people to monitor and maintain their health.
Management systems were in use to minimise the risks from the spread of infection, staff received training about controlling infection and accessed personal protective equipment like disposable gloves and apron's.
The service could continue to run in the event of emergencies arising so that people's care would continue. For example, when there was heavy snow or if there was a power failure at the main office.
The registered manager and staff were working with a clear vision for the service.
Questions to ask the service
- The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Seema Unnithan
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
- Who it supports
- Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)2 inspection reports, latest 19 March 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 07520428 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Medway Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Medway Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01634 334 466
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Medway Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does I Say Supported Living Services Limited provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for I Say Supported Living Services Limited.
- When was I Say Supported Living Services Limited last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for I Say Supported Living Services Limited was published on 19 March 2019.
- Who runs I Say Supported Living Services Limited?
- I Say Supported Living Services Limited is run by 'I Say' Supported Living Services Limited.
- What is I Say Supported Living Services Limited's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 March 2019.
Contact
- Phone
- 01634 712168
- Address
- Unit 82, Riverside Estate, Sir Thomas Longley Road, Medway City Estate, Rochester, ME2 4BH Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Caremark (Dartford, Gravesham & Medway) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Scott Care's Medway Branch Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
- RI London Care (Rochester) Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Everycare (Medway/Swale) Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
- – Victory Locum Limited Kent Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away