Gaia Home Care Ltd
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2022
- Carlton, Barnsley, Yorkshire and the Humber
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
14 months
since the latest rating was published.
41 of 44
rated home care services in Barnsley are rated Good, like this one.
Gaia Home Care Ltd: inspection record
Rated Good in August 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Helping Hands Barnsley Good, 1.5 miles away
- – Hopecare and Health Limited No overall rating, 1.5 miles away
- G Trust Home Care Ltd Good, 1.5 miles away
- G Caring Stars Limited Good, 1.5 miles away
- G Forget Me Not Care Providers Ltd Good, 1.8 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 August 2025 (assessment visit 19 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 21 July to 13 August 2025. Gaia Home Care Ltd is a care at home service providing personal care and support to adults of all ages some of whom were living with dementia and physical disabilities. Not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this assessment there were 8 people receiving personal care. This was the first assessment of the service and we reviewed all key questions and quality statements. The outcome of this assessment was a rating for the service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The provider had a proactive and positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. Lessons were learned from incidents and the provider encouraged members of staff to use reflective practice to improve delivery of care and support. People's needs were assessed before they started using the service and people, and their representatives, were involved in the assessment process. The provider worked with people and healthcare partners to understand what being safe meant to them and the best way for this to be achieved. The provider worked with people to understand and manage risks by thinking holistically. Staff provided care to meet people’s needs which was safe, supportive and enabled people to do the things which mattered to them. The provider made sure there were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff, who received effective support, supervision and development. Members of staff worked together well to provide safe care which met people’s individual needs. The provider assessed and managed the risk of infection. They detected and controlled the risk of it spreading and shared concerns with appropriate agencies promptly. The provider made sure medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities and preferences.
People's needs were reviewed and re-assessed when their needs or circumstances changed, for example, following a period of hospitalisation. The provider planned and delivered people’s care and treatment with them, including what was important and mattered to them. They did this in line with legislation and current evidence-based good practice and standards. Staff supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support. The provider worked with people and their families to support them to live healthier lives and achieve improved outcomes. The provider told people about their rights around consent and respected these when delivering person-centred care and treatment. The provider had processes in place to ask and record people’s consent to care and treatment.
The provider always treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. Care was delivered with kindness and dignity by a team of people who were respectful of people's needs. People's individual needs were identified through careful assessment and then recorded in their care plan. The provider promoted people’s independence, so people knew their rights and had choice and control over their own care, treatment and wellbeing. Members of staff responded to people’s needs in the moment and acted to minimise any discomfort, concern or distress. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care.
People's care plans were person-centred and contained details of their likes and dislikes, interests, hobbies and aspirations. Members of staff understood people’s communication needs and ensured they communicated with people in a way they understood. The provider made it easy for people to share feedback and ideas, or raise complaints about their care, treatment and support. Staff and leaders actively listened to information about people who were most likely to experience inequality in experience or outcomes and tailored their care, support and treatment in response to this.
The provider had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively and they did so with integrity, openness and honesty. The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who worked for them. The provider had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance and they used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. The provider understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services worked seamlessly for people.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Michaela Gallamore
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Gaia Home Care Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 14093845 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01226 773300
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Gaia Home Care Ltd provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Gaia Home Care Ltd.
- When was Gaia Home Care Ltd last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Gaia Home Care Ltd was published on 20 August 2025.
- Who runs Gaia Home Care Ltd?
- Gaia Home Care Ltd is run by Gaia Home Care Ltd.
- What is Gaia Home Care Ltd's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 August 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 07541 568816
- Address
- Midland Works, A1 Filey Avenue, Royston, Barnsley, S71 4PZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Helping Hands Barnsley Good, 1.5 miles away
- – Hopecare and Health Limited No overall rating, 1.5 miles away
- G Trust Home Care Ltd Good, 1.5 miles away
- G Caring Stars Limited Good, 1.5 miles away
- G Forget Me Not Care Providers Ltd Good, 1.8 miles away