Rated Care Homes

Caremark (Mansfield & Ashfield)

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 86 of 114

    rated home care services in Nottinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

Caremark (Mansfield & Ashfield): inspection record

Home care, Nottinghamshire

Rated Good in June 2026.

Caremark (Mansfield & Ashfield): inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    M N Pulse Solutions Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    A.C.C.E.S.S 2016 Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. –
    Major Domicile Ltd - Sutton Nottinghamshire Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  4. O
    Reach Housing & Enablement Services Limited Outstanding, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    Red to Green Care Solutions Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Nottinghamshire

See all home care services in Sutton in Ashfield

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 9 June 2026 (assessment visit 6 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 21 May 2026 to 3 June 2026. Caremark (Mansfield Ashfield) is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care and support to children, older and younger adults with a physical disability, people living with dementia, autistic people, people with a learning disability, people with sensory impairment and people living with mental health conditions. At the time of the assessment, the service was supporting 123 people with their personal care needs. We undertook this assessment due to the length of time since the provider’s last inspection. Caremark (Mansfield Ashfield) was last rated good (published 19 June 2018).

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The provider delivered care that was consistently person-centred, safe, and responsive to people’s individual needs. People were always treated as individuals, and staff demonstrated a strong commitment to going above and beyond to ensure people could access events and activities that were important to their health and wellbeing. This approach supported people to live fulfilling lives and remain connected to their communities.

Independence was actively promoted, with staff demonstrating a good understanding of how to support people to maintain and develop their skills and confidence. Care was tailored to each person, enabling them to retain as much choice and control as possible in their daily lives.

Care plans were developed in partnership with people, their loved ones, and relevant professionals where required. This ensured that care was holistic, accurate, and reflective of people’s preferences, needs, and goals. Plans were reviewed regularly to ensure they remained up to date and responsive to any changes.

Medicines were managed safely and effectively. People were supported to receive their medicines as prescribed, including those that needed to be administered at specific times. Systems were in place to ensure consistency and reduce the risk of errors.

The provider had clear and effective quality monitoring processes in place. Regular audits and checks were undertaken, and feedback was actively sought from both staff and people using the service. This information was used to drive continuous improvement and ensure care remained person-centred and safe. Where areas for improvement were identified, the management team implemented clear action plans and closely monitored progress to ensure improvements were achieved and sustained.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Chloe Holmes
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 19 June 2018. Latest assessment published 9 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
SPM Quality Care LimitedBrand: Caremark
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08568312 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Caremark (Mansfield & Ashfield) provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Caremark (Mansfield & Ashfield).
When was Caremark (Mansfield & Ashfield) last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Caremark (Mansfield & Ashfield) was published on 9 June 2026.
Who runs Caremark (Mansfield & Ashfield)?
Caremark (Mansfield & Ashfield) is run by SPM Quality Care Limited.
What is Caremark (Mansfield & Ashfield)'s CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 9 June 2026.