Rated Care Homes

SureCare Sheffield

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 10 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 81 of 85

    rated home care services in Sheffield are rated Good, like this one.

SureCare Sheffield: inspection record

Home care, Sheffield

Rated Good in December 2025.

SureCare Sheffield: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Baldev Skills Resources Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. –
    Graceful Care Services Limited Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
  4. –
    First Support Care No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  5. –
    Baseline Care Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Sheffield

See all home care services in Central Sheffield

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 December 2025 (assessment visit 24 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 23 November to 18 December 2025. SureCare Sheffield is a care at home service providing personal care and support to adults of all ages some of whom were living with dementia and/or physical disabilities. Not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this assessment there were 31 people receiving care and support. This was the first assessment of the service and we reviewed all key questions and quality statements. The outcome of this assessment was a rating for the service. The service supported some people with a learning disability but their primary care needs were not their learning disability, they required care and support in relation to age-related health conditions. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted and we were assured the service provided safe and effective care and support.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider had a proactive and positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. There were processes in place to review and analyse accidents incidents to identify learning and improvement. The provider shared concerns about safety quickly and appropriately. The provider had clear policies and processes in place to keep people safe from the risk of harm or abuse. People told us their care was safe. People's care plans and risk assessments were detailed and reflected their individual needs. They enabled people’s care to be delivered safely. Medicines were administered safely by appropriately trained and competent members of staff. The management team carried out regular reviews and audits of medication processes.

People’s care plans were person-centred and detailed how they preferred their care to be delivered. The provider worked well across teams and services to support people. They made sure people only needed to tell their story once by sharing their assessment of needs when people moved between different services. The provider supported people to access appropriate care and support services in the local community. There were good relationships and communications with health and care professionals. The provider told people about their rights around consent and respected these when delivering person-centred care and treatment.

The provider always treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. People told us the care and support they received was tailored to their needs. People said they felt in control and their choices were respected. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care.

The provider understood the diverse health and care needs of people and their local communities, so care was joined-up, flexible and supported choice and continuity. Members of staff involved people in decisions about their care and told them what had changed as a result. The provider had effective systems and processes to help ensure people knew how to give feedback about their care and support, including how to raise any concerns or issues. The provider had effective processes and systems in place to help ensure people were able to access the resources they needed and live their lives as they chose, without discrimination.

The provider had a clear vision for their service which focussed on a person-centred approach and the provision of tailor-made care and support for people. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty. The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who worked for them. The provider had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. The provider understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership which ensured services worked seamlessly for people. They shared information and learning with partners and collaborated for improvement. The provider focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jordan Stokes
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14172327 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Sheffield City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does SureCare Sheffield provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for SureCare Sheffield.
When was SureCare Sheffield last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for SureCare Sheffield was published on 22 December 2025.
Who runs SureCare Sheffield?
SureCare Sheffield is run by High Peaks Care Ltd.
What is SureCare Sheffield's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 December 2025.

Contact

Address
Office C, The Hope Centre, Bernard Road, Sheffield, S2 5BQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Baldev Skills Resources Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. –
    Graceful Care Services Limited Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
  4. –
    First Support Care No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  5. –
    Baseline Care Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Sheffield

See all home care services in Central Sheffield