Rated Care Homes

Britz Health Care Ltd

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 98%

    of rated home care services in Doncaster are Good or Outstanding (90% across Yorkshire and the Humber, 88% across England).

Britz Health Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Doncaster

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Britz Health Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: City Care Providers Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Holistic Care 4U (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    City Care Providers Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Holistic Care 4U Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Newdon Care Services Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. –
    Tapera Healthcare Ltd No overall rating, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Orchids Care Good, 1.4 miles away

See all home care services in Doncaster

See all home care services in New Edlington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 23 July 2025 (assessment visit 27 May 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 8 July to 22 July 2025. The service is a care at home service providing support to adults of all ages living with a range of different needs including dementia, physical disabilities and learning disabilities. The provider is also registered to provide supported living services to people but this element of their service provision was not operational at the time of this assessment and, therefore, we did not assess it. At the time of the assessment, the service provided personal care and support to 17 people through its care at home service. Not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only assesses and inspects where people receive personal care. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. We assessed the service because it did not have a rating. The outcome from this assessment was a rating for the service. We looked at all 5 key questions and we assessed all of the quality statements in each of the key questions. This assessment included offsite gathering and review of evidence. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities most people take for granted.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider had a proactive and positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. The provider made sure there was continuity of care, including when people moved between different services. People's needs were assessed before they started using the service. The provider shared concerns quickly and appropriately to keep people safe. There were appropriate policies and processes in place to keep people safe from harm and abuse. Risks to people were assessed and management plans were in place to inform staff how to reduce and manage risks to maintain people’s safety. The provider made sure there were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff, who received effective support, supervision and development. Policies and processes were in place to support the safe administration of medications and regular, in-depth audits of medication administration were carried out by a member of the management team.

People’s care plans and risk assessments were reviewed regularly or when people’s needs changed, to ensure they were still relevant. The provider worked closely with health and care professionals to deliver people’s care as per their expectations. Members of staff supported people to live healthier lives and, where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support. Records of consent from people were maintained by the provider. Members of staff understood consent and people's right to have choices.

Members of staff were kind and caring. They delivered care with compassion and dignity. People’s care records were personalised and contained information about their likes and dislikes and how they preferred staff to support them. Members of staff encouraged people to maintain their independence and make choices about their daily care and support. The provider was responsive to people's changing needs. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care.

People told us the care they received had a positive impact on their lives. The provider understood the diverse health and care needs of people and their local communities, so care was joined-up, flexible and supported choice and continuity. People’s records contained information about how they preferred care to be delivered and guidance for members of staff about how to interact with them. The provider listened to information about people who are most likely to experience inequality in experience or outcomes and tailored their care, support and treatment in response to this.

The provider had a shared vision, strategy and culture. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty. The provider was an inclusive employer and valued equality, diversity and inclusion in their workforce. They spent time engaging with members of staff to assess their satisfaction with leadership, workplace culture, communication, professional development, teamwork and overall support. The provider had a good system of governance and accountability in place. The provider and the management team were committed to continuous improvement and development of the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Mable Jombe
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13613595 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from City of Doncaster Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Britz Health Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Britz Health Care Ltd.
When was Britz Health Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Britz Health Care Ltd was published on 23 July 2025.
Who runs Britz Health Care Ltd?
Britz Health Care Ltd is run by Britz Health Care Ltd.
What is Britz Health Care Ltd's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
07510 145600
Address
The Grainger Centre, Stubbins Hill, Doncaster, DN12 1JN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: City Care Providers Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Holistic Care 4U (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    City Care Providers Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Holistic Care 4U Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Newdon Care Services Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. –
    Tapera Healthcare Ltd No overall rating, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Orchids Care Good, 1.4 miles away

See all home care services in Doncaster

See all home care services in New Edlington