Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd
Home care, Barking and Dagenham
No overall rating
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd: inspection record
This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 2 times since 2018. Rated Good in 2018 and July 2026.
It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2018. The latest rating was published 3 months ago.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 July 2026 (assessment visit 3 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 04 June 2026. Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd provides care to people living in their own home. At the time of the assessment, only one person was receiving support with personal care. No person was receiving care and support in supported living settings which the provider is also registered to provide care and support to people in their own homes. The service was last inspected 19 February 2018 was rated good at that time.
This was a planned assessment of all quality statements under the key questions of safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led. As a result of this inspection, we have rated the service as good for safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led and good overall.
Read the full summary
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability, but the provider had regard to ‘Right support, right care, and right culture’.
The care plan was well written. It included information about how to support the person and included their views about the support they wanted. The care plan was detailed, person-centred and easy for staff to follow. The person was at the centre of their care, they had capacity to make their own decisions, and these were recorded. The person was supported to live an independent life, and to take full control of their life.
Not all the risks were well managed effectively. Potential risks in the care environment were not always managed properly. We discussed this the registered manger and they completed relevant risk assessments following our recommendations.
Staff were well established and had worked for the provider for many years so knew the person well. The provider recruited staff safely that was in accordance with all current legislative requirements. Staff we spoke with understood the person’s needs and spoke warmly of their working relationship with them. Staff completed an induction at the beginning of their employment and received ongoing support through trainings and ongoing discussions. Staff reported having a positive relationship with the provider and felt communication was effective.
The provider had policies and procedures in place which were in line with legislative requirements. This meant staff possessed up to date information which kept the person safe and gave staff guidance on how to do their jobs.
Systems to monitor the quality and safety of the service were in place but they were not effective.
-
Safe
Good
Safe
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Contact and registration details
| Address | The Hubb, 335-351 Rainham Road South, Dagenham, RM10 8QR |
|---|---|
| Neighbourhood | Dagenham, Barking and Dagenham |
| Phone | 020 3372 5517 |
| Website | www.firstchoiceconsultancy.com |
| Registered manager | Patience Obaseki |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 2 inspection reports, latest 17 March 2018 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 10 July 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | 07332482 (opens Companies House) |
Nearest alternatives
- – Aspire Care Services - East London Home care, less than 0.1 miles awayNo overall rating
- – Bishops Healthcare Ltd Home care, less than 0.1 miles awayNot yet rated
- – Haig Park Healthcare Limited Home care, less than 0.1 miles awayNot yet rated
- – TKL Care Limited Home care, 0.1 miles awayNot yet rated
- G Selekt Care Ltd Home care, 0.2 miles awayGood
Getting help from London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 8227 2915
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd.
- When was Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd was published on 10 July 2026.
- Who runs Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd?
- Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd is run by Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd.
- What is Firstchoice Consultancy Ltd's CQC rating?
- No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.