Rated Care Homes

Home Instead Pocklington & Brough

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 33 of 39

    rated home care services in East Riding of Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.

Home Instead Pocklington & Brough: inspection record

Home care, East Riding of Yorkshire

Rated Good in January 2026.

Home Instead Pocklington & Brough: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Bridge Case Management Ltd Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
  3. –
    VCare-24 Head Office and Operations Centre Not yet rated, 1 mile away
  4. G
    Lavender Fields Care Village Good, 2.6 miles away
  5. –
    Simpson Living LTD Not yet rated, 6.6 miles away

See all home care services in East Riding of Yorkshire

See all home care services in Pocklington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 January 2026 (assessment visit 20 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Dates of Assessment: 12, 15 and 16 December 2025

Home Instead Pocklington Brough is a domiciliary care agency. It provides support to people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection 26 people were receiving support with personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People and their relatives were overwhelmingly positive about the service, describing staff as kind, respectful, and attentive. They told us the service made a real difference to their lives.

People felt safe and confident in the care provided. Robust safeguarding processes were in place, and staff understood their responsibilities. Risks were assessed and managed proportionately, with people involved in decisions about their care. Environmental checks and equipment monitoring supported safety, and infection prevention and control measures were consistently applied. Medicines were generally managed safely, although we identified minor inconsistencies in documentation for medicines prescribed on an as and when basis. The registered manager acted promptly to address this.

Care was effective and person-centred. People’s needs were assessed comprehensively, and care plans reflected their preferences, routines, and risks. Staff were well trained and confident in their roles. They worked collaboratively with health professionals to support good outcomes, including recovery after illness or stroke. People were supported to maintain independence and make choices about their care. Preferences, such as gender for personal care, were respected.

The service excelled in caring. People consistently described staff as compassionate and genuinely interested in their wellbeing. Staff went above and beyond, engaging in meaningful conversations and supporting hobbies and interests. Privacy and dignity were upheld at all times.

Care was responsive and tailored to individual needs. People and relatives said staff listened and acted quickly when changes were requested. Reviews were held regularly, and feedback was actively sought. The service met the Accessible Information Standard and provided information in ways that suited people’s communication needs.

Leadership was strong and inclusive. Managers were visible, approachable, and highly regarded by staff and relatives. There was a clear vision and positive culture, with staff describing the team as supportive and well led. Governance systems were effective, with regular audits, supervisions, and spot checks ensuring quality and safety. Staff felt empowered to speak up and were confident concerns would be addressed.

The service was embedded in the local community and promoted social inclusion through initiatives such as companionship lunches and dementia awareness sessions. Staff wellbeing was prioritised, with access to support and recognition schemes fostering a positive working environment.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Rebecca Townsend
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14831974 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from East Riding of Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Home Instead Pocklington & Brough provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Home Instead Pocklington & Brough.
When was Home Instead Pocklington & Brough last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Home Instead Pocklington & Brough was published on 8 January 2026.
Who runs Home Instead Pocklington & Brough?
Home Instead Pocklington & Brough is run by East Riding Home Care Limited.
What is Home Instead Pocklington & Brough's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 8 January 2026.