Rated Care Homes

Cherish Support Services Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 39 of 42

    rated home care services in Bolton are rated Good, like this one.

Cherish Support Services Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Bolton

Rated Good in August 2026.

Cherish Support Services Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Criss Care Solution Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    VCare Professionals Limited Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Rings Homecare Greater Manchester No overall rating, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Dignity In Life Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. –
    Camphora Care Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Bolton

See all home care services in Middle Hulton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 August 2026 (assessment visit 12 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 25 June 2026. This inspection was undertaken to provide a rating. Cherish Support Services is a domiciliary care organisation providing personal care and support in people’s own homes. The service is registered to provide personal care to older people, people living with dementia, people with mental health support needs, people with physical disabilities or sensory impairment and younger adults. At the time of this inspection, 25 people were being supported.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. Staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Staff carried out risk assessments and regularly reviewed these.

People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Leaders made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well, and any gaps in medicines records were rectified immediately.

People received person-centred care. Staff respected people's privacy and treated them with dignity. They understood and responded to people's individual needs. People’s physical, mental and social needs were holistically assessed and met. Care and treatment were based on current best practice and delivered in a coordinated way with involvement from other relevant organisations. Staff focused on maximising people’s strengths and promoting what they could do for themselves.

There was an open and transparent culture within the service with a clear focus on providing good care. People and those important to them were involved in planning their care, where possible. The provider fostered a learning culture and people could raise concerns. Leaders investigated incidents thoroughly.

Staff described a positive culture where they felt supported and able to raise concerns or make suggestions. A staff member told us, “All office staff are visible, and the registered manager is the main point of contact.”

The provider had effective quality assurance and governance arrangements, ensuring consistent oversight and good standards of care. Concerns and complaints were managed appropriately. The registered manager reviewed feedback for trends and shared learning across the team to improve service delivery.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Shazia Yaqoob
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14339332 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Bolton Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cherish Support Services Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Cherish Support Services Ltd.
When was Cherish Support Services Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cherish Support Services Ltd was published on 6 August 2026.
Who runs Cherish Support Services Ltd?
Cherish Support Services Ltd is run by Cherish Support Services Ltd.
What is Cherish Support Services Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01204 963510
Address
245 St. Helens Road, Bolton, BL3 3QA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Criss Care Solution Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    VCare Professionals Limited Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Rings Homecare Greater Manchester No overall rating, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Dignity In Life Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. –
    Camphora Care Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Bolton

See all home care services in Middle Hulton