Rated Care Homes

County Care Berkshire Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 12 of 18

    rated home care services in Windsor and Maidenhead are rated Good, like this one.

County Care Berkshire Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Windsor and Maidenhead

Rated Good in August 2019.

County Care Berkshire Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Concept Living Care Services Ltd Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  2. –
    Guardian Angel Carers Windsor and Maidenhead Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Heritage Healthcare Berkshire Ltd Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Nest HomeCare - Windsor Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Great Park Homecare Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all home care services in Windsor and Maidenhead

See all home care services in Windsor

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 31 August 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

County Care (Windsor) a is a Domiciliary Care Agency (DCA) providing personal care to children and adults. Staff provided care to people within their own homes. At the time of inspection, the service was supporting 34 adults.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where adults receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

Required staff recruitment checks including criminal checks with the Disclosure and Barring Service were carried. However, the management team could not always evidence they had taken a full employment history of some staff. We made a recommendation that the provider refers to current guidance to operate robust recruitment procedures, including undertaking any appropriate relevant checks.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People's care plans identified how their medical condition impacts on their lives and the required action to take to minimise pain. Mental health assessments were in place to detail the outcomes people wanted to achieve. The provider had an effective system to ensure that staff received appropriate training, and all mandatory training was up to date. However, the recording of certain actions taken to keep people safe needed to be further strengthened. We made a recommendation to the provider to consider current guidance on maintaining securely an accurate, complete and contemporaneous records.

There were effective systems in place to safeguard people from harm and abuse. Where a safeguarding concern had been raised, in relation to young people or adults, the registered manager dealt with them appropriately and communicated with all necessary agencies. Risk assessments and care support plans were comprehensive and were reviewed when required to ensure they were kept up to date and reflected any changing needs. People's medicines were managed safely, and new audits system had been put in place to highlight any shortfalls.

People experienced positive relationships with staff who treated them with kindness in their day-to-day care. Staff consistently treated people with dignity and respect and maintained their privacy. Staff had a detailed understanding of people's needs. The service promoted and delivered person-centred care.

There was a clearly defined management structure within the service and quality of the service was monitored through robust clinical governance processes. Staff understood people's needs and preferences and recognised the importance of knowing people well. Staff told us they felt supported by management. Complaints were dealt with effectively. Relative's stated all concerns were dealt with in a timely manner.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Carolyn Beese Jarvis
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Physical Disability, Whole Population

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 31 August 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07767613 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does County Care Berkshire Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for County Care Berkshire Ltd.
When was County Care Berkshire Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for County Care Berkshire Ltd was published on 31 August 2019.
Who runs County Care Berkshire Ltd?
County Care Berkshire Ltd is run by County Care Berkshire Limited.
What is County Care Berkshire Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 31 August 2019.