Rated Care Homes

Solace Prime Care Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 81 of 85

    rated home care services in Sheffield are rated Good, like this one.

Solace Prime Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Sheffield

Rated Good in July 2026.

Solace Prime Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 July 2026 (assessment visit 12 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 17 June 2026 – 1 July 2026. Solace Prime Care Ltd is a care at home service providing personal care and support to people of all ages some of whom were living with physical disabilities and dementia. At the time of this assessment there were 8 people receiving care and support. This was the first inspection of the service and we reviewed all key questions and quality statements. The outcome of this assessment was a rating for the service, and we were assured the service provided care to a good standard.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider had a proactive and positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. The provider shared concerns about safety quickly and appropriately. There were clear systems and processes in place to keep people safe and report concerns about safety. Staff provided care to meet people’s needs which was safe, supportive and enabled people to do the things which mattered to them. There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff, who received effective support, supervision and development. The provider made sure medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities and preferences.

People’s care needs and person-centred care plans were reviewed with them regularly. The provider worked well across teams and services to support people. Systems and processes were in place, so members of staff were able to support people to live healthier lives. Systems were in place to monitor and review people's outcomes and where they changed, these were recorded, appropriate action taken and information shared with community clinicians. People’s capacity to consent to care was assessed and recorded in their care plans. Assessments were decision-specific in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice (MCA).

The provider always treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. The provider treated people as individuals and made sure people’s care, support and treatment met people’s needs and preferences. Staff responded to people’s needs in the moment and acted to minimise any discomfort, concern or distress. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care.

People’s care was person centred. The provider supplied appropriate, accurate and up-to-date information in formats tailored to individual needs. The provider made it easy for people to share feedback and ideas, or raise complaints about their care, treatment and support. The provider made sure people could access the care, support and treatment they needed when they needed it. People were supported to plan for important life changes, so they could have enough time to make informed decisions about their future, including at the end of their life.

The provider’s values and culture helped shape every decision and every visit to people to deliver care and support. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty. The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who worked for them. The provider had comprehensive systems of governance in place, supported by regular audits and reviews carried out by the registered manager. The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and this was confirmed by people’s feedback.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Nabila Akhtar
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14698864 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Sheffield City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Solace Prime Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Solace Prime Care Ltd.
When was Solace Prime Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Solace Prime Care Ltd was published on 28 July 2026.
Who runs Solace Prime Care Ltd?
Solace Prime Care Ltd is run by Solace Prime Care Ltd.
What is Solace Prime Care Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
07926 126930
Address
Steel City Stadium, Olympic Legacy Park, Worksop Road, Sheffield, S9 3TL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)