Rated Care Homes

Enchanting Care

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • 12 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 166 of 205

    rated home care services in Hampshire are rated Good, like this one.

Enchanting Care: inspection record

Home care, Hampshire

Rated Good in October 2025.

Enchanting Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Mushavi Private Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. –
  3. –
    Simplified Staffing Hampshire Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    Wellesley Court Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. G
    Lovedean Homecare Limited Good, 1.1 miles away

See all home care services in Hampshire

See all home care services in Waterlooville

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 October 2025 (assessment visit 3 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 4 September to 18 September 2025. This was a comprehensive assessment of all 5 key questions triggered by our ongoing monitoring of the service. The service is a care at home service providing support to adults of all ages living in their own homes. At the time of the inspection 39 people were using the service. Although the service had the service user band learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, no-one under this service user band was being supported at the time of the assessment. CQC only inspects where people are receiving the regulated activity personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

There was a positive learning culture, where the provider was proactive in seeking feedback and implementing learning to make improvements. People and their relatives knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. People were protected and kept safe from abuse. Staff were happy to raise any safety concerns and felt they would be dealt with properly. There were enough staff in place. Some improvement was needed to recruitment records.

People were consulted around how they wished their care to be carried out. Staff understood and managed risks related to people’s care, however some risk records needed to be more detailed. Safe systems were in place to ensure medicines were administered appropriately where required by competent staff. Staff worked with stakeholders involved in people’s care to promote the best outcomes and safe transitions when people moved between services. The provider made sure staff received training including condition specific training to maintain high-quality care. Staff cared for people with dignity and respect and promoted their independence. People were treated with kindness and compassion and had a good level of consistency in care staff.


Leaders were visible and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. The provider was taking action to ensure the manager completed their registration with CQC. Staff felt able to give feedback and were treated equally. Audits were in place and mostly effective, but the provider had not picked up the issues we found with recruitment and risk records. The provider worked during the assessment to rectify these processes and put in place appropriate oversight going forward. The provider worked with stakeholders in the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Pauline Leoni-Peters
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 24 March 2018. Latest assessment published 15 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09797678 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Enchanting Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Enchanting Care.
When was Enchanting Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Enchanting Care was published on 15 October 2025.
Who runs Enchanting Care?
Enchanting Care is run by Enchanting Care Limited.
What is Enchanting Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 15 October 2025.