Rated Care Homes

Evelyn Grace Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 22 of 22

    rated home care services in West Berkshire are rated Good, like this one.

Evelyn Grace Ltd: inspection record

Home care, West Berkshire

Rated Good in July 2026.

Evelyn Grace Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Harino Care Limited Head Office Good, 2.6 miles away
  3. –
  4. G
    Home Instead (Reading) Good, 2.7 miles away
  5. –
    Premier Medical Staffing Limited Not yet rated, 2.7 miles away

See all home care services in West Berkshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 July 2026 (assessment visit 23 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 28 April 2026-26 May 2026.

Evelyn Grace Ltd is a care at home service. At the time of our assessment, 34 people were receiving support with personal care in their own homes. The service currently provides support for older adults.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Overall, we found the service to be good. People experienced compassionate and responsive care delivered by 2 registered managers and staff who knew them well.

The service was well led, with visible, dedicated and hands-on leadership from the 2 registered managers who worked alongside staff and maintained close relationships with people using the service. There was a good culture of compassion with examples of thoughtful, personalised support that enhanced people’s well-being and quality of life. The registered managers demonstrated a willingness to reflect, learn and make improvements to the service.

The registered managers supported each other and worked alongside staff to build an open and inclusive culture for people, their families and staff. People using the service and staff were confident they could contact the registered managers if they had any issues. The registered managers sought people’s views about the service and learned from the feedback they received.

People were supported by a caring and stable staff team who received training, support and regular supervision. The provider placed an emphasis on staff well-being and ensured staff had the opportunity to develop skills and support people’s individual needs.

People were involved in decisions about their care, and care plans were regularly reviewed and adapted as needs changed. Staff worked closely with health and social care professionals to ensure people received coordinated support, and people and relatives told us communication with the registered managers was open, responsive and reassuring.

Medicines were managed safely, with systems in place to support prompting and administration.

Staff protected people from the risk of harm or abuse and knew how to raise concerns. Staff kept people’s homes clean and followed infection prevention and control procedures to keep people safe.

Staff monitored people’s health needs and quickly sought medical advice in response to any changes. Staff followed professional advice, reviewed outcomes and provided feedback to professionals as and when needed.

People benefitted from a consistent staff team, which included the 2 registered managers, who understood and respected people’s preferences and upheld their dignity. Staff provided person-centred care and knew who and what was important to the people they supported. The registered managers arranged social events to help people feel part of the community. People and their families described care that supported emotional well-being, individuality and a genuine sense of feeling well cared for.

In conclusion, the service was characterised by a positive, values-led culture where people felt safe, cared for and respected, and where the registered managers and staff were committed to providing a consistent quality caring service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Rebekah Miller
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 2 December 2017. Latest assessment published 28 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06733994 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from West Berkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Evelyn Grace Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Evelyn Grace Ltd.
When was Evelyn Grace Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Evelyn Grace Ltd was published on 28 July 2026.
Who runs Evelyn Grace Ltd?
Evelyn Grace Ltd is run by Evelyn Grace Limited.
What is Evelyn Grace Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 July 2026.