Rated Care Homes

1 Homecare

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 183 of 199

    rated home care services in Lancashire are rated Good, like this one.

1 Homecare: inspection record

Home care, Lancashire

Rated Good in May 2026.

1 Homecare: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 May 2026 (assessment visit 31 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 15 to 24 April 2026. The service is a care at home service providing support to people with dementia, people with sensory impairment, people with a learning disability or autistic spectrum disorder.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe from the risk of abuse. Staff understood and managed risks. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. People were involved in planning their future care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. People with protected characteristics felt supported. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Asiea Rashid
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Sensory Impairment, Whole Population

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 17 October 2017. Latest assessment published 13 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10042729 (opens Companies House)

1 Homecare Ltd runs 3 services in England, 2 of them in the North West. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by 1 Homecare Ltd

  1. G
    1 Homecare Blackpool Good. Home care, Blackpool
  2. G
    1 Homecare Bradford Good. Home care, Bradford, Yorkshire and the Humber

Getting help from Lancashire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does 1 Homecare provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for 1 Homecare.
When was 1 Homecare last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for 1 Homecare was published on 13 May 2026.
Who runs 1 Homecare?
1 Homecare is run by 1 Homecare Ltd. It runs 3 services in England, 2 of them in the North West.
What is 1 Homecare's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
01772 301800
Address
5 Hardy Close, Nelson Court Business Centre, Ashton-on-ribble, Preston, PR2 2XP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)