Rated Care Homes

Home Instead Bath and West Wilts

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Outstanding to Good.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 89 of 98

    rated home care services in Wiltshire are rated Good, like this one.

Home Instead Bath and West Wilts: inspection record

Home care, Wiltshire

Rated Good in November 2019, down from Outstanding.

Home Instead Bath and West Wilts: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Honeydew Healthcare Ltd No overall rating, 1 mile away
  2. G
    Rangeford Care - Wadswick Green Good, 1.4 miles away
  3. –
    Marigold Care Chippenham Not yet rated, 2.7 miles away
  4. –
    Phoenix All Care Ltd Not yet rated, 2.7 miles away
  5. –
    Rofemaron Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 2.7 miles away

See all home care services in Wiltshire

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 23 November 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Home Instead Senior Care Bath and West Wilts is registered to provide personal care to people in their own homes. There were up to 112 people using the service. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

Medicine systems were audited regularly, and action plans were developed where gaps were identified. However, there had been a number of medicine errors where staff had not recorded the medicines administered. The providers were taking action to prevent further errors. An electronic system of recording medicines administered was to be introduced.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People's needs were assessed before the service agreed to deliver personal care. Care plans were individualised with people's background information and their preferences. Their abilities to manage their care and how staff delivered personal care was part of the care plan. However, the priorities of care and wishes were not consolidated for one person receiving end of life care. We recommend the provider introduce end of life care plans for people receiving palliative care.

People told us they felt safe with the staff. Safeguarding information and procedures were on display in the office and staff room. Safeguarding referrals were made appropriately.

Systems were in place to manage risk. Where risks were identified individual risk assessments action plans were in place on how to minimise the risk. People's environment was assessed to ensure the safety of people and others.

There was an online system of recording accidents and incident. Reports were reviewed and the follow-up action to prevent any further reoccurrences was detailed They were also analysed to identify patterns and trends such as persistent medicine errors

Staffing levels were determined by the needs of people.

New staff had an induction when they started work for the service. The staff attended the training that ensured people's needs were met and were supported with their performance and development. Performance was monitored through one to one supervision, observations and annual appraisals.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way. People had capacity to consent to their care and treatment. Some people had nominated Lasting Power of Attorney and the provider had checked the status of the legal document with the office of the public guardian. Where people had capacity and deferred consent to their relatives this

needed to be made clear in the documents.

People managed their healthcare. The staff reported concerns about people's healthcare. There were electronic records of health care visits which included the nature of the visits and the outcome.

People and relatives were complimentary about the service. They told us the staff were kind, caring and they would recommend them. They told us their personal care was delivered by staff that knew their preferences and the matching of people to staff ensured relationships were built." We saw photos of when the staff were caring towards people. The staff told us there was always time during their visits to sit and chat with people. The deputy manager told us they ensured the staff employed were caring and compassionate.

Complaints were investigated and resolved. People told us their concerns were resolved whenever they raised concerns.

Quality assurance systems were effective. The national office completed audits of outcomes and the providers developed improvement plans on how to meet shortfalls identified. The views of people and staff about the agency was gathered through questionnaires. Actions were added to the improvement plan from feedback received through surveys.

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kerri Gardner
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 23 November 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Empathy Care LimitedBrand: Home Instead
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07701626 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Wiltshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Home Instead Bath and West Wilts provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Home Instead Bath and West Wilts.
When was Home Instead Bath and West Wilts last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Home Instead Bath and West Wilts was published on 23 November 2019.
Who runs Home Instead Bath and West Wilts?
Home Instead Bath and West Wilts is run by Empathy Care Limited.
What is Home Instead Bath and West Wilts's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 23 November 2019.

Contact

Phone
01249 713777
Address
Unit 7-8, Pickwick Park, Park Lane, Corsham, SN13 0HN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Honeydew Healthcare Ltd No overall rating, 1 mile away
  2. G
    Rangeford Care - Wadswick Green Good, 1.4 miles away
  3. –
    Marigold Care Chippenham Not yet rated, 2.7 miles away
  4. –
    Phoenix All Care Ltd Not yet rated, 2.7 miles away
  5. –
    Rofemaron Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 2.7 miles away

See all home care services in Wiltshire