Rated Care Homes

Care Staff Services Ltd

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2018, most recently Inadequate in April 2026.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 73%

    of rated home care services in Slough are Good or Outstanding (87% across the South East, 88% across England).

Care Staff Services Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Slough

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Care Staff Services Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: CCS Homecare Services Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and K & J Carers (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    CCS Homecare Services Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Careful Choices Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Kindness & Care Home Limited Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    K & J Carers Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. –
    The Oyster Live in Care Company Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away

See all home care services in Slough

See all home care services in Cippenham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 April 2026 (assessment visit 13 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 27 January 2026 to 6 February 2026. We announced the assessment on 26 January 2026 and carried out visits to the office on 27 and 29 January 2026.

  • Safe Inadequate
  • Effective Inadequate
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service is a domiciliary care agency and provides personal care to people living in their own homes. Not everyone was receiving personal care. CQC only inspects where people are receiving the regulated activity personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this assessment 108 people were receiving support with personal care.

The assessment was prompted due to ongoing concerns being received regarding the management of the service, and to follow up on our previous assessment completed in June 2025, when the service was rated inadequate. At this assessment we found breaches of 6 regulations relating to person-centred care, gaining consent, safe care and treatment, good governance, staffing and fit and proper persons employed.

Since our last assessment in June 2025, a new Nominated Individual had taken over responsibilities for the service. Following this transition, a new manager was appointed to work alongside the existing management team. However, over a short period of time the majority of the management team had left the service. This meant the new manager and 1 care co-ordinator were left to oversee the care of 108 people. This presented a significant risk due to the manager being relatively new and not being aware of people’s needs, the systems in place or of staff skills and knowledge. Despite these concerns, the provider had failed to implement contingency plans to ensure continued management oversight of the service and robust business continuity plans. This meant there was a risk people would not receive the care they required in the event of further breakdown of the management team or an emergency situation.

There was a lack of quality assurance measures to identify and address concerns and to ensure action was taken. Whilst the manager acknowledged significant improvements to the service were required, the provider had failed to implement an effective and detailed improvement plan to identify shortfalls, prioritise actions and embed learning.

Although people had support plans in place, these lacked guidance for staff regarding people’s care and information about health conditions, communication needs, risks to their safety, and end of life care planning. Information regarding people’s life histories and things which were important to them was not consistently recorded. These concerns presented a barrier to people receiving safe, effective and responsive care from staff they trusted. The provider was not compliant with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). People’s capacity to make decisions were not always decision specific and best interests’ decisions were not completed in line with MCA principles.

Recruitment practices were not robust which put people at risk of being supported by staff who were not suitable. Staff felt there had been some improvement in the way the service was managed although there were on-going concerns regarding how they were able to share feedback in a transparent way. The manager told us they were working with staff to establish trust and reporting protocols.

This service remains in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provides a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide. In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded.

  1. Safe

    Inadequate

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has remained inadequate. This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment the provider was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, staffing, and fit and proper persons employed. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of these regulations.

    The provider was no longer in breach of regulation relating to safeguarding identified at our last assessment. However, on-going improvement was required to ensure safeguarding processes were consistently followed and embedded into practice.

  2. Effective

    Inadequate

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has remained inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in people’s care, support and outcomes.

    At our last assessment the provider was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to consent. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation. In addition, at this assessment we found the provider was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to person-centred care.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

    At this assessment we found the provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person-centred care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

    At this assessment we found the provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person-centred care.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has remained inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.

    At our last assessment the provider was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Inadequate on 29 April 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Inadequate on 29 April 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Inadequate on 29 April 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 4 September 2019. Latest assessment published 29 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09741025 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Slough Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Care Staff Services Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Care Staff Services Ltd.
When was Care Staff Services Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Care Staff Services Ltd was published on 29 April 2026.
Who runs Care Staff Services Ltd?
Care Staff Services Ltd is run by Care Staff Services Ltd.
What is Care Staff Services Ltd's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
01628 660083
Address
Unit 10 Progress Business Centre, Whittle Parkway, Slough, SL1 6DQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: CCS Homecare Services Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and K & J Carers (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    CCS Homecare Services Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Careful Choices Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Kindness & Care Home Limited Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    K & J Carers Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. –
    The Oyster Live in Care Company Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away

See all home care services in Slough

See all home care services in Cippenham