Rated Care Homes

Live in Care

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 67 of 79

    rated home care services in Somerset are rated Good, like this one.

Live in Care: inspection record

Home care, Somerset

Rated Good in July 2025.

Live in Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Orchard Lea Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. –
    Alina Homecare - Taunton Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Allerton C&S SW Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. –
    MJR Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Somerset

See all home care services in Bathpool

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 24 July 2025 (assessment visit 7 May 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 12 May to 2 June 2025 Live in Care is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people in their own homes. The service specialises in live-in care and community-based support, operating across a broad geographical area. At the time of the assessment, 69 people were receiving support from the service. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. The assessment was carried out remotely. The service does not directly employ carers. Instead, it registers care staff and creates personal profiles for clients to review and select their preferred carer. Once selected, the client becomes the carer’s employer. Despite this arrangement, the service retains oversight of care plans and staff training, which is why it remains registered with the CQC. It also plays a key role in conducting initial assessments, ongoing care reviews, and continuous monitoring of care quality and delivery. There were enough registered carers to meet demand, and the service was actively onboarding new staff. This ensured people had access to a range of staff profiles, supporting them to choose who provided their care and maintain control over their care arrangements. People were safeguarded from harm. Staff received training on recognising and reporting abuse. Safe recruitment systems were in place, however, some improvements were needed to ensure full adherence to the provider’s recruitment policy. Care was delivered by staff who understood people’s needs and the importance of providing effective support. Records confirmed that mandatory training was completed. However, some improvements were needed in the way the service recorded client specific training when this was delivered by healthcare professionals directly to the specific carers to ensure records were clear. Checks of staff practices were conducted, but documentation did not always clearly reflect what was observed, especially regarding medicine administration and moving and handling. Staff were offered regular supervision and annual appraisals. Care and support were responsive to people’s changing needs. Staff demonstrated an understanding of how to meet people’s individual requirements, and people were actively involved in developing their care plans. Consent was obtained for care delivery, and those important to the individual were included in decision-making. However, improvements were needed in how this consent was documented in care records. The service fostered a culture of listening, learning, and trust. Managers and office staff were visible, knowledgeable, and supportive, helping staff in their roles. Staff reported feeling supported, valued, and treated fairly, with no concerns about bullying or harassment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating remained good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating remained good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating remained good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating remained good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Frances Bradshaw
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 8 November 2018. Latest assessment published 24 July 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
9226081 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Somerset Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Live in Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Live in Care.
When was Live in Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Live in Care was published on 24 July 2025.
Who runs Live in Care?
Live in Care is run by Live in Care Ltd.
What is Live in Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 24 July 2025.

Contact

Address
4 Heron Gate Office Park, Hankridge Way, Taunton, TA1 2LR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Orchard Lea Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. –
    Alina Homecare - Taunton Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Allerton C&S SW Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. –
    MJR Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Somerset

See all home care services in Bathpool