Rated Care Homes

Butterflies Care & Support Ltd

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Good in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in September 2020.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 87%

    of rated home care services in Lincolnshire are Good or Outstanding (85% across the East Midlands, 88% across England).

Butterflies Care & Support Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Lincolnshire

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Butterflies Care & Support Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Trent Nursing (Good, 6.4 miles away) and H2H Community Care Ltd (Good, 6.8 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Vitaboost Health Ltd Not yet rated, 6.2 miles away
  2. –
    Blue Swan Health Care Limited Not yet rated, 6.4 miles away
  3. –
    CRT - Lincolnshire Home Care Not yet rated, 6.4 miles away
  4. G
    Trent Nursing Good, 6.4 miles away
  5. –
    Embrace Inspire Support & Care Services Ltd Not yet rated, 6.5 miles away

See all home care services in Lincolnshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 June 2026 (assessment visit 5 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 6 May to 8 June 2026. Site visit was 11 May 2026. Butterflies Care Support Ltd is a care at home service providing support to adults of all ages, including those who are living with dementia care, physical disabilities, autistic people and people with a learning disability. At the time of the inspection there were 6 people being supported with the regulated activity of Personal Care.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

At this inspection, we found 3 breaches of regulation regarding safe management of risks and medicines, quality assurance systems and staff support and development.

Systems to ensure safe, effective and high-quality care were not in place or not used consistently. There was no effective oversight of the service by the provider and registered managers. The registered managers did not have effective processes to monitor risk or staff performance. Audits were not in place and learning was not embedded. This meant risks were not always identified or reduced.

Care planning and risk assessment were not detailed enough to support staff awareness of people’s health conditions. Important information about risks were not always recorded or supported with clear guidance. Medicines were not always managed safely and concerns were not escalated to health professionals.

Safeguarding systems were not consistently applied and staff knowledge varied. Training, supervision and competency checks were not effective, which meant staff were not always fully supported to deliver safe care.

Staff did not always work well with other services. Important information about people’s care was not always shared clearly or in a timely way. People were not always given a clear way to raise concerns, and the provider could not show how they learned from feedback or made changes to improve the service. The provider was unable to demonstrate how outcomes for people were monitored, reviewed or improved over time. This meant there was no clear evidence that people’s care was regularly checked to make sure it was effective or that their quality of life was getting better.

.

Despite these concerns, people and relatives gave positive feedback about staff. There were examples of caring and responsive support, and some effort to work with other professionals and improve care.

In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/ or appeals have been concluded.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the ways people’s medicines and risks were managed and how staff were supported to develop to ensure they had the right skills to support people safely.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 10 September 2020. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  2. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 10 September 2020. Ask how staff protect dignity and how people are involved in decisions about their care.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 10 September 2020. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 10 September 2020. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sally Johnson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 10 September 2020. Latest assessment published 29 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07851773 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Lincolnshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Butterflies Care & Support Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Butterflies Care & Support Ltd.
When was Butterflies Care & Support Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Butterflies Care & Support Ltd was published on 29 June 2026.
Who runs Butterflies Care & Support Ltd?
Butterflies Care & Support Ltd is run by Butterflies Care & Support Ltd.
What is Butterflies Care & Support Ltd's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
07538 742693
Address
2 Eastfield, Sturton By Stow, Lincoln, LN1 2DT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Trent Nursing (Good, 6.4 miles away) and H2H Community Care Ltd (Good, 6.8 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Vitaboost Health Ltd Not yet rated, 6.2 miles away
  2. –
    Blue Swan Health Care Limited Not yet rated, 6.4 miles away
  3. –
    CRT - Lincolnshire Home Care Not yet rated, 6.4 miles away
  4. G
    Trent Nursing Good, 6.4 miles away
  5. –
    Embrace Inspire Support & Care Services Ltd Not yet rated, 6.5 miles away

See all home care services in Lincolnshire