Rated Care Homes

Athlone Care

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Requires improvement in October 2026.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 35 of 212

    rated home care services in Kent are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Athlone Care: inspection record

Home care, Kent

Rated Requires improvement in October 2026.

Athlone Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: MC Care (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Prestige Nursing and Care - Dartford (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Refined Care Services Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    MC Care Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
  5. –
    Chime Care Limited Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Kent

See all home care services in Dartford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 October 2026 (assessment visit 16 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This assessment took place between 20 July and 25 August 2026. We visited the service on 20 July 2026 and reviewed further information off site following the visit.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

During the inspection we found 2 breaches of the regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. The service was previously rated requires improvement and remains so.

The service provides support to people who live in their own homes. At the time of the assessment 187 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care. The service supports both younger and older adults. The service also supports adults a learning disability and/or autistic people. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ (RSRCRC) guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found the service was being provided in line with this guidance and people were being supported to lead positive and dignified lives.

Care plans needed to be improved as there were missing risk assessments and risks where guidance for staff was limited. Care plans and risk assessments varied in quality and did not always give staff clear, up-to-date guidance. Significant concerns were identified in medicines management, including missed or incorrectly timed doses, incomplete guidance for medicines given when required, and recording errors. Governance and auditing systems had not identified or addressed these issues promptly, despite information being available through the provider’s electronic systems. The provider began addressing issues raised during the assessment, but further improvement and stronger oversight were required to ensure everyone consistently received safe, personalised care.

However, the service provided many aspects of care well. Incidents were reported, investigated and action was taken as needed. Staff discussed concerns to learn lessons when things went wrong. Staff worked with partners to share information where appropriate. People were protected from the risk of abuse. Staff knew how to provide people with the support they needed.

There was enough staff to provide support to people. Staff had completed a range of training, and their competency had been assessed. They were well supported and had been recruited safely. Staff worked effectively with health and social care professionals. The provider also demonstrated a strong commitment to staff wellbeing, development and inclusion.Staff felt listed to and valued by the provider and there were mechanisms to gather staff views. Staff told us if they raised concerns, they would be listened to and action taken. Staff were well motivated and told us they enjoyed their role.There was a complaints system in place and mechanism for people and their relatives to feedback about their care.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained the same.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and the ways people’s medicines were managed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question required improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained the same.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 27 October 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 27 October 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
David Mugwangi
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 28 October 2021. Latest assessment published 27 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05897730 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Athlone Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Athlone Care.
When was Athlone Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Athlone Care was published on 27 October 2026.
Who runs Athlone Care?
Athlone Care is run by Athlone Care Ltd.
What is Athlone Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 27 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01322 274747
Address
25 East Hill, Dartford, DA1 1RX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: MC Care (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Prestige Nursing and Care - Dartford (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Refined Care Services Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    MC Care Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
  5. –
    Chime Care Limited Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Kent

See all home care services in Dartford