Rated Care Homes

Home Instead Worthing and Steyning

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2019.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 125 of 138

    rated home care services in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Home Instead Worthing and Steyning: inspection record

Home care, West Sussex

Rated Good in June 2026.

Home Instead Worthing and Steyning: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Chanmil Care Ltd Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    INNOVE24 LTD Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    LQS Healthcare Services Ltd Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Oval Care Services Sussex Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  5. –
    Pentacare (West Sussex & Hove) Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away

See all home care services in West Sussex

See all home care services in Worthing

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 June 2026 (assessment visit 13 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 23 February to 18 March 2026. Home Instead Worthing and Steyning provides personal care for people living in their own homes. The assessment was carried out as part of a routine assessment due to an aged rating. At the time of our assessment, 52 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care. The provider supported people with a range of needs, including older people, people living with dementia and people with physical disabilities.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary


The provider is also registered to support people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of our assessment, the provider was not supporting anyone whose primary need related to a learning disability or autism. The provider demonstrated an approach to care which was person-centred, promoted people’s dignity, independence and choice, and reflected the principles of Right support, right care, right culture.


People received safe, effective and person-centred care. People and their relatives gave consistently positive feedback about the service and told us they felt safe, comfortable and well supported. Staff treated people with dignity and respect and involved them in decisions about their care. Care was delivered by staff who knew people well, which supported continuity and helped people feel at ease.
Care plans were personalised and updated when changes occurred. Staff understood people’s needs and responded appropriately. The provider worked with external professionals to support people’s health and wellbeing.


Systems were in place to support safety and oversight of the service. Risks to people were assessed and managed and staff understood how to recognise and report concerns. Medicines were managed safely and there were processes in place to monitor care delivery and identify areas for improvement.


Staff were supported to carry out their roles through training, supervision and access to support from the office team. Staff spoke positively about the support they received and told us they felt able to raise concerns. There was a positive and open culture within the service, and leaders were approachable and visible.


There was no registered manager in post at the time of the assessment. An application for a registered manager was in progress. Arrangements were in place to support the day-to-day management and oversight of the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe - this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective - this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment, the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring - this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment, the rating has remained Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and were involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive - this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment, the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led - this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment, the rating has remained Good.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Simon McGee
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 5 June 2019. Latest assessment published 18 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10987165 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Home Instead Worthing and Steyning provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Home Instead Worthing and Steyning.
When was Home Instead Worthing and Steyning last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Home Instead Worthing and Steyning was published on 18 June 2026.
Who runs Home Instead Worthing and Steyning?
Home Instead Worthing and Steyning is run by Worthing Home Care Limited.
What is Home Instead Worthing and Steyning's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 18 June 2026.