Main office
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2018
- Rochester, Medway, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
5 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
25 of 42
rated home care services in Medway are rated Good, like this one.
Main office: inspection record
Rated Good in May 2021, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- – Lauriem Bellerphon House (EC) Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- – 121 Rochester Avenue Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
- RI London Care (Rochester) Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
- G Everycare (Medway/Swale) Limited Good, 0.5 miles away
- – Victory Locum Limited Kent Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 7 May 2021. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Main Office is a domiciliary care agency which provides care and support to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help relating to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection 31 people were receiving personal care.
What inspectors found
People and their relatives were positive about the quality of care and support they received. They told us they felt safe using the service.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People were supported by staff who had been recruited safely. They told us they received support from regular care staff who arrived on time. They said they did not feel rushed. People were protected from the risks of abuse and discrimination by staff who had been trained to recognise the signs of abuse and knew how to raise any concerns. The registered manager reported incidents to CQC and the local authority in line with guidance.
Risks to people's safety were assessed, managed and reviewed. Risk assessments covered areas of people's health as well as any potential environmental risks. People received their medicines safely and as prescribed. Staff were trained in medicines management and their competency was regularly assessed to make sure they continued to follow best practice.
There were clear processes in place to ensure people were protected from the risks of infection. Staff completed infection prevention and control training and spoke with us about the importance of wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) correctly. Staff had access to PPE and followed national guidance regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.
People's care and support needs were discussed with them and tailored to meet their individual needs. Care plans were regularly assessed and updated as needed to make sure staff had up to date guidance to follow.
People knew how to complain and were confident, if they had a concern, these would be addressed. When the service received complaints and compliments from people, these were shared with staff.
People and their relatives felt the service was well-led. The registered manager led by example and monitored the quality and safety of the service. People, relatives, health care professionals and staff were asked to provide feedback to enable the registered manager to continue to drive improvements.
Questions to ask the service
- The last rating is 5 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Sophie Bryant
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)2 inspection reports, latest 7 May 2021. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Help at Home (Medway) Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 11262491 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Medway Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Medway Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01634 334 466
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Medway Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Main office provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Main office.
- When was Main office last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Main office was published on 7 May 2021.
- Who runs Main office?
- Main office is run by Help at Home (Medway) Limited.
- What is Main office's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 7 May 2021.
Contact
- Phone
- 01634 471300
- Address
- 153 High Street, Rochester, ME1 1EL Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- – Lauriem Bellerphon House (EC) Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- – 121 Rochester Avenue Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
- RI London Care (Rochester) Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
- G Everycare (Medway/Swale) Limited Good, 0.5 miles away
- – Victory Locum Limited Kent Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away