Rated Care Homes

Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 41 of 44

    rated home care services in Barnsley are rated Good, like this one.

Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Barnsley

Rated Good in September 2026.

Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Forget Me Not Care Providers Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Helping Hands Barnsley Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. –
    Hopecare and Health Limited No overall rating, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Trust Home Care Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Caring Stars Limited Good, 0.7 miles away

See all home care services in Barnsley

See all home care services in Staincross

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 September 2026 (assessment visit 20 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

The service is a care at home service. At the time of the inspection, 15 people were receiving personal care and support.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

The service supports older people, people who are living with dementia and people with physical disabilities who are living in their own homes.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment remotely between 21 and 31 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

There was a culture of learning and improvement throughout the service with a focus on identifying and sharing learning from accidents and incidents. Systems and processes ensured people were safe. A member of staff told us, "We keep the people we care for safe by having clear safeguarding policies and making sure staff are well-trained to spot and report any concerns.” People’s needs were assessed appropriately and risks managed and mitigated. There were clear, person-centred care plans in place which reflected people’s choices and preferences. Members of staff were recruited safely and received training and support to deliver safe care to people. Medicines were administered safely and the management team carried out audits of records and spot checks on competencies of members of staff.

People and their families were involved in regular reviews of their care needs. A member of staff told us, “Risks are regularly reviewed and updated as people’s needs change. We balance safety with promoting independence, ensuring people are supported to make informed choices while minimising risks." We saw evidence of improved outcomes for people who received care and support. For example, a person’s family reported improved confidence and independence, better consistency with daily routines, and increased engagement and motivation. People were involved in discussions and decisions about their care. Where people lack capacity to make specific decisions, the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 were followed, and best interest decisions made with the involvement of those who knew people well. A member of staff told us, “We involve people by listening to their wishes, preferences and choices and encouraging them to make decisions about their care. We explain what support will be provided, seek their consent before delivering care, and respect their right to refuse. Care is always provided in line with the Mental Capacity Act.”

People were supported to maintain their independence and have choice and control of their care. Feedback from reviews of people’s care highlighted instances where people said staff were kind, respectful and allowed them to maintain their independence. One person appreciated the time members of staff took to listen to their choices and to support them to complete tasks at their own pace.

People’s care was person-centred. Care plans were considered ‘living’ documents and were reviewed regularly, or sooner if people’s needs changed. There were good systems in place to listen to people if they wanted to provide feedback or raised concerns about the service. The provider aimed to remove barriers wherever possible and strived to ensure people could access care and support which promoted dignity, independence, choice and positive outcomes.

The service was well led, and the management team were committed to providing a service where people were treated fairly, regardless of age, disability, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation or background. Good governance systems included regular audits of care records, medication, incidents and quality of care, to support continuous service improvement and learning. A member of staff told us, “I am encouraged to share my views, raise concerns and contribute ideas. We are always looking for ways to improve our service through training, feedback and continuous learning. This ensures the people we support receive the highest standard of care."

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and this was confirmed by people’s feedback.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Charlotte Mellor
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 11 October 2018. Latest assessment published 1 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10626699 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd.
When was Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd was published on 1 September 2026.
Who runs Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd?
Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd is run by Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd.
What is Compassionate Care Home Care Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01226 248827
Address
19-21 Laithes Lane, Barnsley, S71 3AA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Forget Me Not Care Providers Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Helping Hands Barnsley Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. –
    Hopecare and Health Limited No overall rating, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Trust Home Care Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Caring Stars Limited Good, 0.7 miles away

See all home care services in Barnsley

See all home care services in Staincross