Rated Care Homes

InSafeHands Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 50 of 65

    rated home care services in Cheshire East are rated Good, like this one.

InSafeHands Limited: inspection record

Home care, Cheshire East

Rated Good in July 2019.

InSafeHands Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. O
    AStar Homecare Services Limited Outstanding, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    All Age Development Trust Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Cross Care Limited Good, 4 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    CareKind Good, 4 miles away

See all home care services in Cheshire East

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 16 July 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service:

Read the rest of CQC's summary

InSafe Hands Limited is a domiciliary agency providing personal and nursing care to 41 people aged 65 and over at the time of the inspection.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People's experience of using this service and what we found:

The service was planned around people's individual needs and was effective in meeting them. The service worked collaboratively with others so that each individual received an holistic and coordinated service

The service was planned effectively and well managed. There was clear leadership and oversight of the service. The registered manager was extremely knowledgeable, highly motivated and very well organised.

The support provided to people was seamless because there was a suitably experienced group of staff who could deputise in the registered managers absence. All staff had clearly defined and well understood roles. Communication between staff and the office was robust and this ensured the needs of people using the service were known. Any risks or changes in people's needs were quickly identified and addressed.

The service had very robust systems in place to monitor compliance and help ensure the service was delivered in line with the organisational business plan. All aspects of the service took into account any relevant legislation and best practice. The service ensured compliance with its own key performance indicators through a series of checks and audits. They were not complacent and were constantly looking at ways of improving and making things better for people, families and the wider community.

It embraced new ideas and technology whilst also investing time and money its work force to be the best they could be. It acted on feedback and had a robust quality assurance system which put people at the heart of everything it did. It was open and transparent as demonstrated by its response to safeguarding concerns, complaints which were dealt with effectively.

Service delivery was safe and in line with the wishes and preferences of people. Timings of calls were monitored by an electronic system which ensured the safety of staff and meant people had their calls as planned. Any risks have been identified and planned for. Staff had sufficient knowledge about people to enable them care for people in line with their wishes and preferences. Staff had regular rounds which helped ensure continuity and people told us they got to know the staff and were able to rely on them and trust them.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported support them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff were very well organised and efficient. They demonstrated a caring, flexible attitude and real commitment to ensuring people came first. Staff said they were never rushed and took pride in their work. There were robust recruitment processes in place which helped ensure staff with the right values and skills were employed.

Staff were supported through training, observations of practice, supervisions and annual appraisal. These systems helped to support staff develop professionally. Senior staff spoken with had been promoted internally through the organisation and were given the opportunities develop. This helped the service to attract and retain staff which benefited people using the service. Most staff we spoke with were experienced with many years' service.

The service embraced equality and diversity and helped ensure that the service reflected the needs of people using the service. The service was regularly discussed with people to help ensure that they had no concerns or if they had ideas about how the service could be improved upon. This was acted upon and the service was forward thinking and maintained high standards in everything they did whilst continuously trying to improve.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Ashley Matunhike
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 16 July 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07220930 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Cheshire East Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does InSafeHands Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for InSafeHands Limited.
When was InSafeHands Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for InSafeHands Limited was published on 16 July 2019.
Who runs InSafeHands Limited?
InSafeHands Limited is run by InSafeHands Limited.
What is InSafeHands Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 July 2019.

Contact

Phone
01270 626020
Address
Office 29 Park View Business Centre, Combermere, Whitchurch, SY13 4AL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. O
    AStar Homecare Services Limited Outstanding, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    All Age Development Trust Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Cross Care Limited Good, 4 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    CareKind Good, 4 miles away

See all home care services in Cheshire East