Rated Care Homes

Laura Cares

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 5 of 18

    rated home care services in Windsor and Maidenhead are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Laura Cares: inspection record

Home care, Windsor and Maidenhead

Rated Requires improvement in October 2022.

Laura Cares: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Heritage Healthcare Berkshire Ltd (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Nest HomeCare - Windsor (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Heritage Healthcare Berkshire Ltd Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Nest HomeCare - Windsor Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. RI
    Great Park Homecare Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    King Homecare Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Elegant Care Services Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away

See all home care services in Windsor and Maidenhead

See all home care services in Windsor

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 6 October 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Laura Cares is registered to provide personal care and support to people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection the service provided care and support to 35 people.

What inspectors found

People were not always protected when potential or alleged abused had happened. This was because management were not aware of their individual responsibilities to prevent, identify and report all allegations of abuse. The service did not do all that was reasonably practicable to mitigate risks to people who were at risk of falls, living with dementia and had difficulty swallowing. There were unsafe recruitment practices, we have made a recommendation about this. People were safely supported with administration of medicines and from the risk of infection.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Assessments relating to peoples' care and support needs did not fully factor the needs of people living with dementia and did not identify all of peoples' protected characteristics as identified in the Equality Act 2010. People received care and support from staff who were not always inducted, suitably qualified, skilled and supported to meet their care and support needs. Appropriate referrals were made to relevant health and social care professionals to ensure people received timely care. We have made a recommendation in relation to staff supporting people with swallowing difficulties.

People were not supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not support them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the registered manager did not work in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and its Code of Practice.

People's care was not always personalised and responsive to their needs and their preferences for end-of- life care were not captured. We have made a recommendation about this. The provider did not have effective systems to make sure all complaints were documented, investigated, and to ensure people were always provided with the outcomes. The service worked in accordance with the Accessible Information Standard and documented peoples' communication needs.

The registered manager had lost managerial oversight of the service and failed to follow policies and procedures which, if followed, would have helped them to be compliant with the relevant legislations. Quality assurance systems were ineffective because the service's internal audit processes were not able to identify when things went wrong and were completed by staff who did not have the skills to understand the significance of them. The service did not promote a culture that encouraged candour, openness and honesty at all levels when incidents happened. We have made a recommendation about this. Verbal feedback was sought but was not used improve the quality and delivery of care. The service did access external partners when necessary to improve the care outcomes for people.

People and relatives were very positive about the caring nature of staff. Comments included, "Very polite and helpful" and "They (staff) love her, they are so kind to her, they joke with her, we have a lovely relationship." People and relatives told us they were treated with respect and dignity and their independence was promoted.

The registered manager was aware they needed additional support and had brought in another registered manager to assist them, as well as was seeking support from a local association, that supported registered providers.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 6 October 2022. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 6 October 2022. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 6 October 2022. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 6 October 2022. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Laura Soye
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 6 October 2022. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10615077 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Laura Cares provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Laura Cares.
When was Laura Cares last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Laura Cares was published on 6 October 2022.
Who runs Laura Cares?
Laura Cares is run by Laura Cares Limited.
What is Laura Cares's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 6 October 2022.

Contact

Phone
07534 472724
Address
107 Springfield Road, Windsor, SL4 3PZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Heritage Healthcare Berkshire Ltd (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Nest HomeCare - Windsor (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Heritage Healthcare Berkshire Ltd Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Nest HomeCare - Windsor Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. RI
    Great Park Homecare Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    King Homecare Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Elegant Care Services Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away

See all home care services in Windsor and Maidenhead

See all home care services in Windsor