Rated Care Homes

Bkind Care Ltd

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 22 of 132

    rated home care services in Leeds are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Bkind Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Leeds

Rated Requires improvement in February 2026, up from Inadequate.

Bkind Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bluebird Care Leeds North (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Right at Home North Leeds, Otley and Wetherby (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Bluebird Care Leeds North Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
  3. –
  4. G
    Epoch Homecare Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. –
    Sabin Care No overall rating, 1 mile away

See all home care services in Leeds

See all home care services in Kirkstall

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 24 February 2026 (assessment visit 19 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 2 to 16 December 2025. Bkind Care is a care at home service providing support to people living in their own homes. At the time of assessment, the service was providing care to 29 people who lived in Leeds. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do; we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this assessment 20 people were receiving support with personal care.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations related to consent, safe care and treatment, and good governance. At this assessment, we found some improvements had been made in relation to seeking and recording consent, but we continued to find alack of compliance with the safe care and treatment and good governance regulations previously breached. We also found the provider was operating from a location that was not their registered address.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability. The provider showed limited regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance.

We continued to find a lack of effective management and oversight at the service. The provider failed to implement effective processes to monitor and improve the quality of the service and identify the issues found during our assessment. Records were not always complete or contemporaneous. Management was not always following the regulations, best practice guidance or their own policies and procedures.

Staff had received mandatory training and had their competencies assessed, however staff did not always receive supervisions in line with the provider’s policy. The provider was registered to care for children, although was not supporting any children at the time of the assessment. The provider did not have relevant policies, procedures and training in place if they were to provide care for children.

Most risks to people were identified, assessed and monitored, but we found examples where risk assessments were not in place. We found further improvements were required to ensure the safe management of medicines.

There was a system in place to assess the capacity of people who required it, however we continued to find inconsistency with the provider's quality of records in this area.

People received support to maintain good nutrition and hydration, and their healthcare needs were understood and met. The provider kept in close contact with relevant healthcare professionals.

This service remains in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service continued to be in breach of legal regulation in relation to the management of people’s medicines.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question in adequate. At this assessment the rating has remained inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.

    The service continued to be in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance and oversight at the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 24 February 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 24 February 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 24 February 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  4. Well-led was rated Inadequate on 24 February 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Leticia Tarisayi
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 24 June 2022. Latest assessment published 24 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11161322 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Leeds City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bkind Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Bkind Care Ltd.
When was Bkind Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bkind Care Ltd was published on 24 February 2026.
Who runs Bkind Care Ltd?
Bkind Care Ltd is run by Bkind Care Ltd.
What is Bkind Care Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 24 February 2026.

Contact

Phone
07753 170268
Address
Suite 2, Floor 1, Wira House, West Park, Leeds, LS16 6EB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bluebird Care Leeds North (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Right at Home North Leeds, Otley and Wetherby (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Bluebird Care Leeds North Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
  3. –
  4. G
    Epoch Homecare Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. –
    Sabin Care No overall rating, 1 mile away

See all home care services in Leeds

See all home care services in Kirkstall