Reflections Community Support
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2013
- Leeds, Yorkshire and the Humber
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in March 2026.
7 months
since the latest rating was published.
109 of 132
rated home care services in Leeds are rated Good, like this one.
Reflections Community Support: inspection record
Rated Good in March 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- – Radfield Home Care North Leeds & Ilkley Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
- G Anchor Trust (The Laureates) Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Caring Heart and Hands LTD Good, 1 mile away
- G Wharfedale View Good, 1.1 miles away
- G Clarity Homecare Leeds & Bradford Good, 1.6 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 March 2026 (assessment visit 8 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
The assessment was conducted remotely between 09 February to 23 February 2026. Reflections Community Support is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people in their own homes. At the time of inspection, they were providing support to 16 people.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects services where personal care is provided this includes assistance with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where applicable, any wider social care provided is also considered.
The provider had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission, ensuring that both the registered manager and the provider were legally accountable for the operation of the service and the quality and safety of care delivered. Governance systems were in place; however, some improvements were required to strengthen oversight. A couple of supervision records had not been completed consistently in line with organisational expectations, and a training gap was identified in relation to continence support. This shortfall was acted upon promptly, and relevant staff were provided with the required training to ensure competence in this area.
Recruitment procedures were safe, with appropriate checks conducted to ensure staff were suitable to work with people using the service. People experienced punctual and consistent care, and staffing arrangements supported continuity. Infection prevention and control measures were effective, PPE was accessible, and staff followed established procedures. Medicines were managed safely in accordance with recognised best practice.
Care plans were in place and regularly reviewed to reflect changes in need. The provider responded flexibly to ensure continuity and coordinated working, and information was communicated clearly while maintaining confidentiality. Complaints were managed in line with policy, with concerns acknowledged, investigated and used to improve practice. Adjustments were made to ensure fairness, equity and timely access to care and support.
The provider collaborated with external professionals and community organisations, enabling coordinated, holistic care and supporting people to maintain wellbeing and community connections.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Reca Brocklebank
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)3 inspection reports, latest 25 October 2017. Latest assessment published 25 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Reflections Community Support
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 07385945 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Leeds City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Leeds City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0113 222 4401, weekdays 9am to 5pm (Wednesdays from 10am)
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Leeds City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Reflections Community Support provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Reflections Community Support.
- When was Reflections Community Support last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Reflections Community Support was published on 25 March 2026.
- Who runs Reflections Community Support?
- Reflections Community Support is run by Reflections Community Support.
- What is Reflections Community Support's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 25 March 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01943 876649
- Address
- 4 Oxford Street, Guiseley, Leeds, LS20 9AX Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- – Radfield Home Care North Leeds & Ilkley Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
- G Anchor Trust (The Laureates) Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Caring Heart and Hands LTD Good, 1 mile away
- G Wharfedale View Good, 1.1 miles away
- G Clarity Homecare Leeds & Bradford Good, 1.6 miles away