Grasmere Nursing Home
- Care home
- 20 beds
- Nursing care
- Registered since 2011
- Worthing, West Sussex, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
14 months
since the latest rating was published.
47 of 309
rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Grasmere Nursing Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in August 2025, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Avon Manor (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Abi House (Good, 0.1 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Avon Manor Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Abi House Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Care for Veterans Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Hurst Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Wraysbury House Limited Good, 0.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 August 2025 (assessment visit 19 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 24 June to 18 July 2025
Grasmere nursing home is a 'care home' that provides accommodation for older people, some of whom require support with their nursing needs. We reviewed Safe, Caring and Well-led key questions at this inspection visit.
- Safe No rating
- Caring Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
At our last inspection Grasmere had 3 breaches of regulation in safe and well-led. We reviewed the concerns leading to those breaches at this inspection visit and found most of the concerns had been addressed.
At this inspection we found one breach in Well-led in respect of the governance of the service. This was in relation to failure to appropriately implement the Mental Capacity Act, to seek consent and assessing capacity around specific decisions. This element of the breach was ongoing from the last inspection. We have asked the provider for an action plan to address the concerns.
We also found the provider lacked oversight into the systems and processes. Audits were not verified, and concerns were missed or not fully addressed. We received information following the inspection which demonstrated that the provider had allegedly allowed practice in contravention of their own risk assessments which placed people at potential risk.
Whilst there were areas to improve, there had been improvements made since the last inspection.
Staff knew people well and provided safe, effective and responsive support. Staff had a clear understanding of their responsibilities under safeguarding from abuse, while the provider understood their regulatory responsibilities to report allegations. People were generally involved in the management of risk to their care and support. People were supported by enough staff and staff felt supported by the provider. The staff team was consistent and long standing; this was valued by the staff themselves as well as people and their relatives.
Appropriate infection control procedures were in place and the environment was kept clean and a safe place for people to live. Staff monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and support needs which enabled them to give informed consent to everyday things like what to wear and what to eat.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
-
Caring
Good
The provider always treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. Staff treated colleagues from other organisations with kindness and respect. One person said, referring to the staff, “I have the very best of carers here.” We observed staff and people engaged in friendly conversations and appropriate banter. We saw a lot of smiles when staff and people were in each other’s company.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
At this inspection we found the provider to be in breach of regulation, in respect of Governance. There was a failure to act on information of concern in a timely manner or report concerns to relevant agencies. On going failures to follow the MCA appropriately and failure to have in place robust quality assurance systems above manager level.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 13 August 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 13 August 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Sunie Kurian
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)6 inspection reports, latest 28 September 2017. Latest assessment published 13 August 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Kargini Care Services Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 04619743 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from West Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at West Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01243 642121, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: West Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Grasmere Nursing Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Grasmere Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Grasmere Nursing Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 20 beds at Grasmere Nursing Home.
- When was Grasmere Nursing Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Grasmere Nursing Home was published on 13 August 2025.
- Who runs Grasmere Nursing Home?
- Grasmere Nursing Home is run by Kargini Care Services Limited.
- What is Grasmere Nursing Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 13 August 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01903 201281
- Address
- 51 Manor Road, Worthing, BN11 4SH Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Avon Manor (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Abi House (Good, 0.1 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Avon Manor Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Abi House Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Care for Veterans Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Hurst Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Wraysbury House Limited Good, 0.1 miles away