Rated Care Homes

Adel Grange Residential Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 19 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 29 of 138

    rated care homes in Leeds are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Adel Grange Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 30 beds, Leeds

Rated Requires improvement in April 2025, down from Good.

Adel Grange Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Raynel Drive (Good, 0.9 miles away) and Alexandra Court Residential Home (Good, 1 mile away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Adel Square Care Home Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  2. G
    Raynel Drive Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. –
    Cookridge Court Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
  5. RI
    Brandon House Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Leeds

See all care homes in Meanwood

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 April 2025 (assessment visit 30 January 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We visited the service on 5 February 2025.

The inspection was prompted, in part, by notification of an incident following which a person using the service had died. The incident did not meet the threshold for a criminal investigation. However, the information shared with CQC about the incident indicated potential concerns about the quality of care plans. This inspection examined those risks. The service is a care home providing care for up to 30 people. At the time of the inspection, there were 30 people using the service. We found medication was not always managed safely, care plans did not always include key information about risks to people, some care plans were missing or had minimal information about people’s assessed needs and fire risks were not always managed safely. Although staff had received safeguarding training, some staff were unable to tell us basic information on how to safeguard people from abuse or neglect. Whilst audits and checks were being completed, we found these did not always identify and resolve the issues we observed whilst on inspection. We found the care provided by staff was high quality, person centred and staff knew people well. People and their family were involved in the assessment of their care needs. Care plans and risk assessments were reviewed. Leaders and staff had a shared vision to provide high quality care. Leaders were present and visible in the service and there was enough staff to provide safe care. We found the provider was in breach of legal regulation relating to managing risks to people, ensuring people had a robust care plan in place and having systems in place to monitor the quality of the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to assessing and managing risks to people.

  2. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  3. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  4. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to ensure everyone receiving care had a detailed care plan and monitoring the quality of the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 1 April 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 1 April 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Luke Flynn
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 4 December 2020. Latest assessment published 1 April 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03564629 (opens Companies House)

Parkfield Health Care Limited runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Parkfield Health Care Limited

  1. G
    Westfield Manor Good. Care home with nursing, Bradford

Getting help from Leeds City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Adel Grange Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Adel Grange Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Adel Grange Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Adel Grange Residential Home.
When was Adel Grange Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Adel Grange Residential Home was published on 1 April 2025.
Who runs Adel Grange Residential Home?
Adel Grange Residential Home is run by Parkfield Health Care Limited. It runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Adel Grange Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 1 April 2025.

Contact

Address
Adel Grange Close, Adel, Leeds, LS16 8HX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Raynel Drive (Good, 0.9 miles away) and Alexandra Court Residential Home (Good, 1 mile away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Adel Square Care Home Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  2. G
    Raynel Drive Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. –
    Cookridge Court Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
  5. RI
    Brandon House Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Leeds

See all care homes in Meanwood