Rated Care Homes

Garlands Residential Care Home Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 89 of 119

    rated care homes in Kirklees are rated Good, like this one.

Garlands Residential Care Home Limited: inspection record

Care home, 23 beds, Kirklees

Rated Good in June 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Garlands Residential Care Home Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Newlands Hall Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Spen Court Care Home Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Abuv & Beyond Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Claremont House Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Norcott House Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Kirklees

See all care homes in Heckmondwike

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 June 2025 (assessment visit 10 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 24 March 2025 to 23 April 2025. Garlands care home is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care to up to 23 people. At the time of our assessment, there were 19 people living at the home. This assessment was prompted by concerns we had received about the service. The service was previously in breach of the legal regulation relating to good governance. Not enough improvements had been found at this assessment, so the provider remains in breach of this regulation. During the assessment, we found audits completed did not identify the concerns we saw in relation to medicines, recording of incidents, staff files and care records. We also found there was no clear process in place for staff to record incidents which would allow learning from any incidents that occurred. We found that the service did not have a clear staff structure, some staff had multiple roles which made it difficult to determine what roles needed covering and some staff were repeatedly taken away from their allocated role to step into another role. Everyone had a care plan in place but there was mixed level of detail in care plans. Overall, people and relatives were positive about the care they received. Staff had good knowledge of people’s care needs, including the cook. We observed caring inactions between most staff and people. Staff protected people's privacy and dignity. We found no concerns in relation to administering medication but there were some gaps in the auditing process. Times of medication administration were not reviewed and neither was the use of thickeners. We found that the premises were clean and welcoming with no malodour.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The home was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance as the systems and processes were not completely effective in ensuring a consistently high-quality service. Improvements had not been made at this assessment and the home was still in breach of this regulation.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 13 June 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Linzi Anne Bolland
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 4 September 2019. Latest assessment published 13 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06220073 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kirklees Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Garlands Residential Care Home Limited provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Garlands Residential Care Home Limited as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Garlands Residential Care Home Limited have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 23 beds at Garlands Residential Care Home Limited.
When was Garlands Residential Care Home Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Garlands Residential Care Home Limited was published on 13 June 2025.
Who runs Garlands Residential Care Home Limited?
Garlands Residential Care Home Limited is run by Garlands Residential Care Home Limited.
What is Garlands Residential Care Home Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 June 2025.

Contact

Phone
01924 404122
Address
27 Church Street, Heckmondwike, WF16 0AX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Newlands Hall Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Spen Court Care Home Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Abuv & Beyond Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Claremont House Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Norcott House Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Kirklees

See all care homes in Heckmondwike