Abbeydale - Derby
- Care home
- 41 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Central Derby, Derby, East Midlands
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
This month
The latest rating was published.
17 of 63
rated care homes in Derby are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Abbeydale - Derby: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in October 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Autonomy: Victoria & Elizabeth (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Abbey Court Nursing and Residential Home (Good, 0.4 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Stanley House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
- RI Elderflower House Nursing and Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- G Autonomy: Victoria & Elizabeth Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Abbey Court Nursing and Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Mercy Care Centre Good, 0.4 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 October 2026 (assessment visit 25 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 18 August to 16 September 2026. This service is a care home providing personal and nursing care for up to 41 older adults, some who may be living with physical disabilities and dementia. At the time of our assessment 31 people lived at Abbeydale – Derby. This assessment was completed due to the length of time since the last ratings inspection.
- Safe No rating
- Effective No rating
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
A learning culture had not always been effectively operated to help prevent incidents recurring.
Care plans and risk assessments were not always up to date or reflected how risks to people’s health should be managed. Information in care plans was sometimes contradictory and people’s involvement in on-going reviews of their care plans and risk assessments was not always evident.
Medicines had been administered safely however, improvements were needed to how some medicines were stored and how the effectiveness of some medicines were recorded.
Whilst a variety of food choices was available for people, not everyone was provided with food choices that met their needs. Monitoring of people’s care was not always effective.
The principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) had not always been considered or followed.
Some aspects of leadership were not yet fully effective as the governance systems were not yet fully embedded to identify where the service needed to improve and how to mitigate risks. Records were not always accurate or complete.
However, staff understood the principles of safeguarding and what actions to take to help protect people from abuse. Recruitment checks were completed before staff started to work at the care home to help ensure they were suitable to work there. Staff provided timely care to people.
There were safety measures in place to help ensure the care home premises was safe. There was a regular cleaning schedule in place to ensure the care home was kept clean.
Staff worked well together and treated people with kindness and respect. They worked to promote people’s independence. Staff told us they felt well-supported by the leaders at the service and were confident to speak up if they thought anything was wrong.
Staff provided a range of activities for people and worked to engage them in interests and maintain their connection to the local community.
Staff worked to provide person-centred care to people however, inaccuracies in people’s care plans meant this was not always consistent.
Staff had built links and worked in partnership with other health and social care services to help people access the care they needed. Staff understood any communication needs people had.
We found three breaches of the regulations relating to safe care and treatment, consent and good governance.
We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and consent and decision making under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA).
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 27 October 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 27 October 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 27 October 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Inger Bailey
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)9 inspection reports, latest 6 July 2022. Latest assessment published 27 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Willover Property Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 01154443 (opens Companies House)
Willover Property Limited runs 2 services, all in the East Midlands. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Willover Property Limited
- RI Stanley House Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, Derby
Getting help from Derby City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Derby City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01332 640777, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Derby City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Abbeydale - Derby provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Abbeydale - Derby as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Abbeydale - Derby have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 41 beds at Abbeydale - Derby.
- When was Abbeydale - Derby last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Abbeydale - Derby was published on 27 October 2026.
- Who runs Abbeydale - Derby?
- Abbeydale - Derby is run by Willover Property Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the East Midlands.
- What is Abbeydale - Derby's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 27 October 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01332 331182
- Address
- 182 Duffield Road, Derby, DE22 1BJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Autonomy: Victoria & Elizabeth (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Abbey Court Nursing and Residential Home (Good, 0.4 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Stanley House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
- RI Elderflower House Nursing and Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- G Autonomy: Victoria & Elizabeth Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Abbey Court Nursing and Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Mercy Care Centre Good, 0.4 miles away