Rated Care Homes

Manor Park Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 22 of 102

    rated care homes in Bradford are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Manor Park Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 22 beds, Bradford

Rated Requires improvement in October 2026, down from Good.

Manor Park Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Rix House (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Valley View Court (Good, 1.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Rix House Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. –
    DEVONSHIRE GARDENS CARE HOME LIMITED Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  3. RI
    Norwood House Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  4. –
    Herncliffe Care Home Not yet rated, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Valley View Court Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Bradford

See all care homes in Keighley

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 October 2026 (assessment visit 19 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Dates of assessment: 3 September 2026 to 16 September 2026. Manor Park Care Home is a 22 bedded residential care home, supporting people living with mental health issues. At the time of our assessment there were 19 people living at the service. We visited the service on 3 September 2026 and 7 September 2026. We carried out this assessment to check the provider had made the required improvements after our last assessment of the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider was in breach of 4 legal regulations in relation to safeguarding, staffing, safe care and treatment and good governance. There were widespread failures in relation to the leadership and oversight of the service.

Audits and checks were not robust, which impacted on the quality and safety of the service people received. Whilst most risks were assessed, there was a lack of evidence they were fully reviewed which highlighted the processes for learning lessons and making improvements were not effective. Processes for safeguarding people from abuse and poor care were not always robust. Improvements were required in how medicines were administered and monitored, although most people did receive their medicines as prescribed. There were enough staff to support people safely, and clear recruitment processes were in place. However, staff did not receive the necessary training, support and supervision they required to be able to fulfil their role effectively. Improvements were required to ensure the home was clean and well-maintained.

People’s needs were assessed before they started to use the service. There was a consistent staff team who knew people well. There were links with other health and social care professionals, and staff communicated appropriately with relatives and advocates. Staff demonstrated they were kind and caring, although we found some shortfalls which compromised people’s dignity and there was a focus on task-based interactions. There was a lack of meaningful opportunities for activities and community participation.

In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to staffing, safeguarding and safe care and treatment, including infection, prevention and control and the management of medicines.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care. The provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to good governance of the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 11 October 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 11 October 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 11 October 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 11 October 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered manager
Olu Femiola
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 9 March 2021. Latest assessment published 11 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Manor Park Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Manor Park Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Manor Park Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 22 beds at Manor Park Care Home.
When was Manor Park Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Manor Park Care Home was published on 11 October 2026.
Who runs Manor Park Care Home?
Manor Park Care Home is run by Mr Olu Femiola.
What is Manor Park Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 11 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01535 680410
Address
52 Victoria Road, Keighley, BD21 1JB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Rix House (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Valley View Court (Good, 1.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Rix House Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. –
    DEVONSHIRE GARDENS CARE HOME LIMITED Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  3. RI
    Norwood House Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  4. –
    Herncliffe Care Home Not yet rated, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Valley View Court Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Bradford

See all care homes in Keighley