Rated Care Homes

Ghyll Royd Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in October 2026.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 104 of 138

    rated care homes in Leeds are rated Good, like this one.

Ghyll Royd Care Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 76 beds, Leeds

Rated Good in October 2026.

Ghyll Royd Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Primrose Court Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Campbell Court Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Guiseley Manor Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    RecoveryHub@NorthwestLeeds Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. –
    Weavers Court Care Home Not yet rated, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Leeds

See all care homes in Guiseley

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 5 October 2026 (assessment visit 4 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Assessment date: 1 and 2 September 2026.

Ghyll Royd Care Home is a nursing care home providing accommodation and personal care for older people and younger adults, including people living with dementia, physical disabilities, sensory impairments and mental health needs. The service can support up to 76 people and 49 people were using the service at the time of inspection. We inspected to update the rating for this service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff worked closely with healthcare professionals to ensure people’s changing needs were identified and responded to promptly, and care plans were detailed, person-centred and regularly reviewed.

People benefited from a caring and inclusive culture where their wellbeing, independence and choices were promoted. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people’s individual preferences, risks and support needs, and worked collaboratively with relatives and professionals to achieve positive outcomes. Medicines were managed safely, infection prevention and control arrangements were effective, and safeguarding processes were well understood and consistently followed.

However, we identified some areas where further improvements were needed. Feedback about staffing levels was mixed, with some people, relatives and staff describing occasions when staff appeared rushed. Although staffing levels were assessed and monitored, leaders recognised the need to continue working with people, relatives and staff to provide assurance about staffing arrangements. People and relatives expressed significant dissatisfaction with the quality and variety of meals provided. Managers responded immediately, implemented improvements and developed a clear action plan to improve people’s dining experiences.

The service was led by approachable and committed leaders who promoted openness, learning and continuous improvement. Governance systems were largely effective in identifying risks and monitoring the quality of care, and leaders demonstrated a willingness to listen to feedback and act when concerns were raised. Overall, people received safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led care from a staff team committed to achieving positive outcomes and maintaining a supportive, person-centred culture.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 11 August 2021. Latest assessment published 5 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04248839 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Leeds City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Ghyll Royd Care Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Ghyll Royd Care Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Ghyll Royd Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 76 beds at Ghyll Royd Care Home.
When was Ghyll Royd Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ghyll Royd Care Home was published on 5 October 2026.
Who runs Ghyll Royd Care Home?
Ghyll Royd Care Home is run by Ghyll Royd Nursing Home Limited.
What is Ghyll Royd Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 5 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01943 870720
Address
New Ghyll Royd, Guiseley, Leeds, LS20 9LT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Primrose Court Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Campbell Court Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Guiseley Manor Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    RecoveryHub@NorthwestLeeds Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. –
    Weavers Court Care Home Not yet rated, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Leeds

See all care homes in Guiseley