Rated Care Homes

Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 17 of 63

    rated care homes in Derby are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby: inspection record

Care home, 27 beds, Derby

Rated Requires improvement in June 2026, down from Good.

Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Kingsway View Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Royal Manor Nursing Home (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Kingsway View Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Royal Manor Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Manorfields Residential Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Western Mount Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Brookfields Private Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Derby

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 9 June 2026 (assessment visit 26 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 13 April to 20 April 2026

Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby is a residential care home, registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to provide care to a maximum of 27 adults over 65 years with dementia. At the time of this assessment 21 people were living at the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The assessment was carried out due to the length of time since the last assessment.

The provider’s systems and oversight arrangements were not always effective in ensuring people received safe, well-planned and responsive care. Risks were not always fully assessed, and care records did not always contain accurate or up-to-date information to guide staff. Although staff often understood people’s needs well in practice, this knowledge was not always reflected in care plans or risk assessments.

There were not always enough staff deployed effectively to meet people’s needs, particularly during busy periods. This affected staff capacity to provide meaningful engagement and respond to people’s immediate needs. Governance systems did not always identify concerns relating to staffing, medicines management, environmental risks or documentation.

The provider worked positively with healthcare professionals and staff sought advice when people’s needs changed. However, this information was not always reflected in people’s care records, which increased the risk of inconsistent care delivery. Systems to monitor care quality and support improvements were not always effective.

Staff promoted people’s independence and wellbeing and made efforts to celebrate important occasions and provide personalised support. However, opportunities for meaningful activities and future care planning were limited.

People received care from a staff team who knew them well and were committed to providing kind and person-centred support. Throughout the assessment, people, relatives and professionals spoke positively about the caring approach of staff and the relationship built within the home. Staff understood people’s preferences, routines and communication needs and treated people with dignity and respect.

During the assessment, the provider responded positively to feedback and took some immediate action to address concerns identified. The provider acknowledged improvements were needed and shared plans to strengthen oversight. It will take further time for them to embed this and to be able to demonstrate its effectiveness.

At this assessment, we found 1 breach of regulation in relation to good governance.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance. This was because systems to support quality, safety and continuous learning were not operating effectively.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 9 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 9 June 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 9 June 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 9 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Katie Di Francesco
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 25 February 2022. Latest assessment published 9 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06603399 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Derby City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 27 beds at Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby.
When was Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby was published on 9 June 2026.
Who runs Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby?
Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby is run by Holly Tree Lodge Limited.
What is Holly Tree Lodge Residential Home Derby's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 9 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
01332 382660
Address
2-4 Thornhill Road, Derby, DE22 3LX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Kingsway View Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Royal Manor Nursing Home (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Kingsway View Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Royal Manor Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Manorfields Residential Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Western Mount Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Brookfields Private Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Derby