Rated Care Homes

Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 21 of 29

    rated care homes in Portsmouth are rated Good, like this one.

Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 32 beds, Portsmouth

Rated Good in July 2026.

Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Kinross Residential Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    The Haven Heights Care Home Ltd Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Hamilton House Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. O
    Portsdown View Outstanding, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Belmont Castle Good, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Portsmouth

See all care homes in Paulsgrove

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 July 2026 (assessment visit 1 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Our view of the service

About the service

The service is a residential care home with 2 floors, each providing care and support to older people with residential needs. There were 25 people using the service at the time of the inspection.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

This service provides support to older people with residential needs and for people living with dementia.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 18 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives. One person told us, "No restrictions, get up when I want, go to sleep if I want to," whilst another commented, "You are not compelled to do anything."

Staff supported people safely because they had the skills, knowledge and training to meet people's needs. Staff assessed and managed risks in ways that promoted people's independence while protecting them from avoidable harm. Staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities, managed medicines safely and maintained a clean, safe and well-maintained environment.

Staff assessed people's needs thoroughly and reviewed their care as those needs changed. They worked proactively with GPs and other healthcare professionals to help people achieve positive outcomes. Staff completed regular training, supervision and competency assessments, enabling them to deliver care that reflected current best practice. Staff involved people and, where appropriate, those important to them in planning and reviewing care.

Staff treated people with kindness, compassion and respect. They built meaningful relationships with people, understood what mattered to them and promoted their dignity, privacy and emotional wellbeing. Staff encouraged people to remain as independent as possible and adapted their support to reflect individual preferences.

Staff delivered personalised care that reflected people's preferences, life histories and changing needs. They supported people to make meaningful choices about their daily routines, meals, activities and social relationships. Staff encouraged people to maintain hobbies, access community activities and spend time with those important to them, helping to promote wellbeing and reduce social isolation.

The provider promoted equality, diversity and human rights by respecting people's individual identities, cultural backgrounds, beliefs and communication needs. Staff supported people to maintain relationships with family, friends and the wider community, helping people to remain connected to the people and activities that mattered most to them.

Leaders created a positive and supportive culture where people, relatives and staff felt listened to and valued. Managers maintained effective governance systems that monitored quality, reviewed risks, oversaw medicines and drove continuous improvement. Staff described managers as approachable and supportive and spoke positively about teamwork, communication and opportunities to learn and develop.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Daniel Luter
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 6 April 2022. Latest assessment published 29 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Riva Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04637405 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Portsmouth City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 32 beds at Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home.
When was Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home was published on 29 July 2026.
Who runs Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home?
Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home is run by Riva Limited.
What is Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 July 2026.

Contact

Address
358 Havant Road, Farlington, Portsmouth, PO6 1NE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Kinross Residential Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    The Haven Heights Care Home Ltd Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Hamilton House Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. O
    Portsdown View Outstanding, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Belmont Castle Good, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Portsmouth

See all care homes in Paulsgrove