Rated Care Homes

Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 28 of 89

    rated care homes in West Northamptonshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 46 beds, West Northamptonshire

Rated Requires improvement in July 2026, down from Good.

Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Brook House Care Home (Outstanding, 2.7 miles away) and Oxendon House Care Home (Good, 3.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. O
    Brook House Care Home Outstanding, 2.7 miles away
  2. –
    Hunters Lodge No overall rating, 2.8 miles away
  3. G
    Oxendon House Care Home Good, 3.3 miles away
  4. G
    Lenthall House Good, 3.8 miles away
  5. G
    Herons Lodge Good, 4.1 miles away

See all care homes in West Northamptonshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 July 2026 (assessment visit 24 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This assessment took place between 21 January and 26 February 2026 and included site visits on 21 and 22 January and 17 February 2026. Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home is a care home with nursing providing accommodation and personal care to older people, including people living with dementia. The service can accommodate up to 44 people. At the time of the assessment, 42 people were living at the service (30 in the main building, including 2 in the cottage, and 12 in the Garden Wing).

  • Safe Good
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This was a routine assessment of the service. The assessment included observations of care, speaking with people and relatives, interviews with staff and managers, and a review of care records, policies and monitoring systems.

Overall, people were supported by staff who were kind, respectful and attentive. Staff knew people well and demonstrated a good understanding of their needs and preferences. People told us they felt safe and valued the care provided. Safeguarding systems were in place, staff had received relevant training, and incidents were recorded and reviewed to support learning and improvement.

The environment was clean and well maintained, and infection prevention and control practices were effective. Fire safety systems were in place and information to support emergency evacuation was accessible. During the assessment, some environmental risks were identified, including unsecured wardrobes and a sharps bin left unattended on a medication trolley. The provider took immediate action to address these issues.

There were enough staff available to meet people’s needs, and staff received regular training and supervision. Nurses were supported to maintain their professional registration and skills. However, recruitment processes were not always fully robust. Records did not always evidence that original DBS certificates had been seen, and references did not always fully confirm employment history. These issues were addressed once identified.

Medicines were generally well managed and staff were trained and assessed as competent. However, improvements were needed in recording refusals or omissions and ensuring follow-up action was clearly documented. Medication audits had not identified some of these issues, which showed the audit system required strengthening.

People’s needs were assessed before admission and care plans were reviewed regularly. Staff demonstrated good knowledge of people’s health conditions and worked with external professionals such as GPs, dietitians and speech and language therapists to support people’s wellbeing. However, some care plans and risk assessments lacked detail or consistency, particularly when people’s needs changed. Improvements were needed to ensure care documentation and monitoring systems were consistently accurate and effective.

Leadership was viewed positively by staff and relatives, and the service promoted an open culture where people felt able to speak up. However, governance systems were not always effective in identifying shortfalls. Some issues found during the assessment had not been identified through internal audits, which meant leaders did not always have full assurance that systems were working effectively.

Overall, people experienced caring support from staff who knew them well. Improvements are needed to strengthen care documentation, monitoring systems and governance processes to ensure quality and safety are consistently maintained.

We identified a breach of regulation in relation to good governance. This service has been rated requires improvement overall. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns we found during this assessment.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires Improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    During this assessment we identified a breach of regulation relating to governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 15 July 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 15 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Paula Nuttall
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 9 October 2019. Latest assessment published 15 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03258429 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from West Northamptonshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 46 beds at Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home.
When was Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home was published on 15 July 2026.
Who runs Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home?
Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home is run by Pretty 333 Limited.
What is Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 15 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01858 881304
Address
Church Street, Sibbertoft, Market Harborough, LE16 9UA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Brook House Care Home (Outstanding, 2.7 miles away) and Oxendon House Care Home (Good, 3.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. O
    Brook House Care Home Outstanding, 2.7 miles away
  2. –
    Hunters Lodge No overall rating, 2.8 miles away
  3. G
    Oxendon House Care Home Good, 3.3 miles away
  4. G
    Lenthall House Good, 3.8 miles away
  5. G
    Herons Lodge Good, 4.1 miles away

See all care homes in West Northamptonshire