Rated Care Homes

Brook House Care Home

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Good to Outstanding.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 3 of 148

    rated care homes in Leicestershire are rated Outstanding, like this one.

Brook House Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 41 beds, Leicestershire

Rated Outstanding in July 2026, up from Good.

Brook House Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Hunters Lodge No overall rating, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home Requires improvement, 2.7 miles away
  3. RI
    The Grange Residential Home Requires improvement, 4.9 miles away
  4. G
    Lenthall House Good, 5.7 miles away
  5. G
    Oxendon House Care Home Good, 5.8 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 July 2026 (assessment visit 24 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection, 9 to 15 June 2026. The inspection of this location was prompted due to the historic rating.

Brook House Care Home is a care home registered to provide personal care and accommodation for up to 41 older people, including those living with dementia. At the time of the inspection, the service was supporting 29 people.

  • Safe Outstanding
  • Effective Outstanding
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Outstanding
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider’s ethos towards care was embedded across the workforce. All those involved were committed to improving people’s lives. People’s care was person centred, with staff facilitating positive outcomes for people, maximise their health and wellbeing, and being supported to live life to the full by taking on new challenges, hobbies and interests.

People’s support and care was facilitated by staff who had undergone a safe recruitment process, and who had the training, skills and knowledge to facilitate excellent outcomes for people. Training for staff reflected specific areas of people’s needs, which included dementia awareness and skills to equip staff with clinical skills and care competences. Staffing numbers and their deployment enabled staff to be extremely responsive to people’s needs, in support of their physical and mental health, their well-being, reflective of a person-centred approach to care.

Person-centred care covered all aspects of people’s lives, including end-of-life care. The commitment of all staff in providing high quality and individualised end of life care was recognised through their achievement of being accredited with the Gold Standards Framework, training programme designed to help care services provide proactive, personalised and coordinated care for end-of-life care.

The provider had committed resources to improving the environment and had designed the garden to cater and meet the needs of people living with dementia, older people and with mobility difficulties.

All staff demonstrated a positive, committed, compassionate and caring approach to supporting and enabling people to achieve their goals and aspirations, so they could live their lives to the fullest. Social inclusion was a high priority, with staff actively supporting people to pursue their interests and hobbies, maintain meaningful friendships, and develop new social connections that enriched their wellbeing and sense of belonging.

People received excellent, consistent, and person‑centred care and support. The pre‑assessment process, development of care plans, risk assessments, and ongoing review systems were highly robust, involving the person or their representative. This ensured care remained accurate, responsive and individualised.

The management team were long standing, knowledgeable and experienced. A highly visible, supportive and managerial presence was acknowledged by people, family members, staff and external professionals.

Internal communications systems were robust. Staff were consistently informed of any changes to people’s care needs or health conditions, ensuring continuity and safety. Staff received regular opportunities to discuss their work, training, and development needs, and their contributions were recognised and celebrated.

Staff had developed effective working relationships with external professionals, ensuring people received consistent, well‑coordinated, and holistic care. This collaborative approach enabled staff to respond promptly to changing needs, share essential information, and support people to achieve the best possible outcomes.

Systems and processes, underpinned by policies and procedures enabled the registered manager and management team to maintain a clear overview of the service being delivered, and respond in a timely way to implement changes in response to any concerns or feedback.

People were supported safely with their prescribed medicines, and staff liaised proactively with GPs and other professionals when concerns were identified. Where people required support with nutrition and hydration, this was managed and monitored to a high standard. The quality and presentation of the food provided had a positive impact on people’s nutritional intake, further promoting people’s health and wellbeing.

The provider had invested significantly in strengthening systems and processes that assessed, reviewed, and monitored quality and safety. Governance procedures were robust, providing clear visibility of performance and enabling swift, effective action where improvements were identified. This supported continuous learning, ensured risks were well managed, and helped maintain consistently high standards of care across the service.

  1. Safe

    Outstanding

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were protected by a strong and distinctive approach to safeguarding, including positive risk-taking to maximise their control over their lives. People were fully involved, and the provider was open and transparent when things went wrong.

  2. Effective

    Outstanding

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently better than expected compared to similar services. People’s feedback described it as exceptional and distinctive.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Outstanding

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant service leadership was exceptional and distinctive. Leaders and the culture they created drove and improved high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Michelle Hood
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 3 March 2022. Latest assessment published 21 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05942536 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Leicestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Brook House Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Brook House Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Brook House Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 41 beds at Brook House Care Home.
When was Brook House Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Brook House Care Home was published on 21 July 2026.
Who runs Brook House Care Home?
Brook House Care Home is run by Brookhouse Care Home Limited.
What is Brook House Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 21 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01858 880247
Address
15 Bell Lane, Husbands Bosworth, Lutterworth, LE17 6LA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Hunters Lodge No overall rating, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Sibbertoft Manor Nursing Home Requires improvement, 2.7 miles away
  3. RI
    The Grange Residential Home Requires improvement, 4.9 miles away
  4. G
    Lenthall House Good, 5.7 miles away
  5. G
    Oxendon House Care Home Good, 5.8 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire