Rated Care Homes

Consort House Nursing Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 58 of 83

    rated care homes in Plymouth are rated Good, like this one.

Consort House Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 60 beds, Plymouth

Rated Good in December 2019.

Consort House Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. O
    Hartley Park Care Home Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Torr Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Thornbury Villa Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Greenacres Care Centre Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Chatsworth Residential Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Plymouth

See all care homes in Crownhill

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 14 December 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Consort House Nursing Home is a nursing and residential care home. It is registered to provide accommodation and personal care and accommodation for up to 58 older people. The service supports people with nursing needs, physical disabilities, mental health and/ or dementia. At the time of the inspection there were 47 people living at the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service is on three floors, with access to upper floors via a shaft lift. All bedrooms have en-suite facilities. There is an outside garden area.

What inspectors found

People lived in a service which had a strong, visible person-centred culture. People were at the heart of the service. Staff were motivated to deliver high quality care by the providers embedded values of: "compassion, care, competence, communication, courage, and commitment". People told us staff were very kind and caring, and they were treated with dignity and respect.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People told us they felt safe living at the service. Overall, people and relatives told us there were enough staff to meet their needs, however others, including staff felt there needed to be more. The registered manager and provider had taken pro-active action to improve staffing numbers, and retention but stressed this was an ongoing area that required improvement.

We therefore recommend, as part of the providers overall governance framework, they listen to people and staffs continued feedback about staffing levels and act as required.

People told us they felt staff had the skills and experience to meet their individual needs and staff were complimentary of the training and support they received.

Assessments of people's needs were comprehensive, expected outcomes were identified and care and support, was regularly reviewed. The service worked with agencies to ensure people's care and support needs were met and co-ordinated.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People who had risks associated with their care, had these managed consistently and safely. People lived in a service which was clean and free from odour, and the environment was assessed for risks. The design and decoration of the service took account of dementia best practice, and people's bedrooms were personalised.

People were highly complimentary of the food, and people's nutritional likes, and dislikes were known and catered for. People were encouraged and empowered to keep active and socially stimulated.

People and relatives felt confident to complain, and to speak with the registered manager at any time. There was an open culture where by all safety concerns which were raised were valued and used as learning and improvement.

People had care plans in place regarding their health and social care. Care plans were individualised, so staff knew how people wanted and wished their care and support to be delivered. People's medicines were managed safely, and they received them as prescribed. People were supported with dignity and compassion at the end of their life.

People and staff told us the service was well managed. Staff were proud and motivated to work for the organisation. There was constructive engagement with staff, and people who used the service to ensure a safe and quality service.

The registered manager and staff engaged positively with stakeholders to help build seamless experiences for people. External professionals and stakeholders were positive about the management and leadership of the service, and of their proactive engagement.

Since our last inspection, a new governance framework had been created to help effectively identify where improvements were required.

The registered manager and provider were highly passionate about continuous development and admitted when things went wrong, which demonstrated the requirements of the Duty of Candour (DoC), to be open, honest and transparent.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Emma Chapman
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 14 December 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06408512 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Plymouth City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Consort House Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Consort House Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Consort House Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 60 beds at Consort House Nursing Home.
When was Consort House Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Consort House Nursing Home was published on 14 December 2019.
Who runs Consort House Nursing Home?
Consort House Nursing Home is run by Xcel Care Homes Ltd.
What is Consort House Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 December 2019.

Contact

Phone
01752 789861
Address
35 Consort Close, Torr Lane, Plymouth, PL3 5TX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. O
    Hartley Park Care Home Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Torr Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Thornbury Villa Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Greenacres Care Centre Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Chatsworth Residential Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Plymouth

See all care homes in Crownhill