Rated Care Homes

Arbory Residential Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    First rated Good in 2016, most recently Requires improvement in July 2026.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 59 of 420

    rated care homes in Hampshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Arbory Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 60 beds, Hampshire

Rated Requires improvement in July 2026.

Arbory Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Ravenna Lodge (Good, 1.6 miles away) and Clifford House Residential Care Home (Good, 2.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Ravenna Lodge Good, 1.6 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Ashbourne Court Care Home Good, 2.2 miles away
  4. G
    Willow Court Nursing Home Good, 2.4 miles away
  5. G
    Andover Nursing Home Good, 2.5 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 July 2026 (assessment visit 5 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 27 and 28 May 2026. Arbory Residential Home provides accommodation with personal care for up to 60 people. Accommodation is arranged in 2 buildings, linked by a courtyard. Both buildings have stair and lift access. At the time of this inspection there were 42 people living at the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This was an assessment to check whether improvements had been made following our previous inspection. At our last assessment, the provider was in breach of 3 of the legal regulations in relation to safeguarding, fit and proper persons and governance. Some improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of the regulations in relation to safeguarding and fit and proper persons. However, the provider remained in breach of the regulation in relation to governance because further improvements were needed. ​ In addition, the provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to safe care and treatment because of medicines management concerns.​ This was a comprehensive inspection, and we reviewed all the quality statements.

Medicines were not always managed safely. Although audits of medicines had been carried out and some issues had been identified, these had not been rectified.

People’s needs were assessed and reviewed regularly. People and their relatives were being encouraged to take part in care planning and reviews. Risk assessments were completed, and care plans provided guidance to staff on maintaining people’s safety; however, records did not always show that care plan guidance was being followed. Staff were appropriately skilled, qualified, and experienced to meet people’s needs. Safeguarding procedures were followed, and effective systems were in place to manage concerns. Records showed that people received enough food and drink to maintain their health.

We received mixed feedback about staffing levels from staff and health professionals.

Routine safety checks were carried out across the premises and on all equipment. Fire risks had been assessed, and action was being taken to appropriately manage these. Incidents were investigated by managers, and learning was shared with staff. Staff worked closely with other healthcare professionals and monitored people’s health to promote wellbeing.

The service was clean and generally well maintained, with staff following infection prevention and control guidelines. Staff reported feeling valued and respected and were supported to develop professionally. Overall, they spoke positively about their roles and the leadership team, telling us morale had improved since the appointment of the new manager. One staff member commented, “[Manager name] is more proactive and supportive. Everything, even the general vibe in the place is completely different and the residents feel that as well; they can pick up on things.”

There was a service improvement plan in place, and some improvements had been identified and made, however, concerns identified during this assessment showed governance systems were not fully effective.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment and the way people’s medicines were managed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service remained in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 8 July 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 8 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

14 inspection reports, latest 14 October 2023. Latest assessment published 8 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Coate Water Care (Arbory) LimitedBrand: Coate Water Care Company
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06443478 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Arbory Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Arbory Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Arbory Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 60 beds at Arbory Residential Home.
When was Arbory Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Arbory Residential Home was published on 8 July 2026.
Who runs Arbory Residential Home?
Arbory Residential Home is run by Coate Water Care (Arbory) Limited.
What is Arbory Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 8 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01264 363363
Address
London Road, Andover Down, Andover, SP11 6LR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Ravenna Lodge (Good, 1.6 miles away) and Clifford House Residential Care Home (Good, 2.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Ravenna Lodge Good, 1.6 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Ashbourne Court Care Home Good, 2.2 miles away
  4. G
    Willow Court Nursing Home Good, 2.4 miles away
  5. G
    Andover Nursing Home Good, 2.5 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire