Albury House
- Care home
- 12 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Berwick-upon-Tweed, Northumberland, North East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
7 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
16 months
since the latest rating was published.
77 of 89
rated care homes in Northumberland are rated Good, like this one.
Albury House: inspection record
Rated Good in June 2025, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Tweed View House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Tweedmouth House Good, 0.4 miles away
- G La Cura House Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Turret Villa Retirement Home Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
- G Garden House Good, 1.3 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 17 June 2025 (assessment visit 12 February 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment 26 February 2025 – 13 May 2025.
Albury House is a small family run care home which provides accommodation and personal care for up to 12 older people, some of whom were living with a dementia. Not everyone who lived at the home received personal care. CQC only inspects when people live at the home and receive personal care. At the time of the assessment, 11 people were living at the home; however, only 8 people received personal care and therefore came under the CQC regulated service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We carried out the assessment because we received concerns about people’s care, staff support at night and the management of the home. There was 1 staff member on duty overnight. They were supported, if required, by the registered manager who lived on site in a separate flat. We did not find any evidence of these concerns or that people had been placed at risk of harm. We also carried out the assessment to check the provider had met the requirements of the warning notice which we issued at our previous inspection in relation to the management of the home. We checked they had also followed their action plan in relation to the breaches of the regulations relating to consent and staff recruitment.
At this assessment, we found that the provider had complied with legal requirements and had taken action to improve their rating to good.
The home had 2 registered managers. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
Systems were in place to safeguard people from abuse. There were no ongoing safeguarding investigations. This was confirmed by the local authority. People told us they felt safe. Staff were knowledgeable about what action they would take if abuse were suspected.
Systems were in place to monitor and assess risks. Electronic risk assessments were completed to document all areas of risk such as moving and handling and falls. We did not observe any unsafe practices during our visits to the home.
The provider valued their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for staff who worked for them. Staff gave positive feedback about working at the home. Most of the staff had worked there for a long time and staff turnover was low.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last inspection, we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last inspection, we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our previous inspection, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our previous inspection, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last inspection we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Margaret Burn
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)10 inspection reports, latest 23 January 2024. Latest assessment published 17 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Mr & Mrs A G Burn
- Ownership type
- Partnership
Getting help from Northumberland County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Northumberland County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01670 536 400
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Northumberland County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Albury House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Albury House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Albury House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 12 beds at Albury House.
- When was Albury House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Albury House was published on 17 June 2025.
- Who runs Albury House?
- Albury House is run by Mr & Mrs A G Burn.
- What is Albury House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 17 June 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01289 302768
- Address
- 17-19 Tweed Street, Berwick Upon Tweed, TD15 1NG Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Tweed View House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Tweedmouth House Good, 0.4 miles away
- G La Cura House Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Turret Villa Retirement Home Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
- G Garden House Good, 1.3 miles away