Staverton
- Care home
- 14 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2010
- Central Wokingham, Wokingham, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
8 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
34 of 41
rated care homes in Wokingham are rated Good, like this one.
Staverton: inspection record
Rated Good in June 2018.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Down Lodge Residential Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
- RI Lovat House Residential Care Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Murdoch House Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Suffolk Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Ashton Good, 0.7 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 13 June 2018. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
This inspection took place on 16 May 2018 and was unannounced.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Staverton is a care home without nursing that provides a service to up to 14 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic spectrum disorder. The accommodation is arranged over three floors. At the time of our inspection there were 13 people living at the service.
At our last inspection we rated the service good. At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the rating of good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.
At this inspection we found the service remained Good.
Why the service is rated Good. People were protected from the risks of abuse. Risks were identified and managed effectively to protect people from avoidable harm. Recruitment processes were in place to make sure, as far as possible, that people were protected from staff being employed who were not suitable. Medicines were handled correctly and safely.
People received effective care and support from staff who knew them well and were trained and supervised. People received care and support which was personalised to meet their individual needs. They knew how to complain and staff knew the process to follow if they had concerns.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People's right to make their own decisions were protected.
People benefitted from a service which had an open and inclusive culture. Staff were happy working at the service and people benefitted from having staff who felt well managed and supported.
People were treated with care and kindness and their right to confidentiality was protected. People were treated with respect and their dignity was upheld. People's diversity needs were identified and incorporated into their care plans where applicable.
People benefitted from a service which had an open and inclusive culture. Staff were happy working for the service and people benefitted from staff who felt well managed and supported.
Further information is in the detailed findings of the full report.
The five questions we ask about services and what we found
Questions to ask when you visit
- The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Rose Marau
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)5 inspection reports, latest 13 June 2018. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Anthony Toby Homes Trust
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 05062777 (opens Companies House)
- Charity number
- 1104552
Anthony Toby Homes Trust runs 2 services, all in the South East. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Anthony Toby Homes Trust
- G Ashton Good. Care home, Wokingham
Getting help from Wokingham Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Wokingham Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 365 1234
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Wokingham Borough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Staverton provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Staverton as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Staverton have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 14 beds at Staverton.
- When was Staverton last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Staverton was published on 13 June 2018.
- Who runs Staverton?
- Staverton is run by Anthony Toby Homes Trust. It runs 2 services, all in the South East.
- What is Staverton's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 June 2018.
Contact
- Phone
- 0118 977 1157
- Address
- 25 Murdoch Road, Wokingham, RG40 2DQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Down Lodge Residential Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
- RI Lovat House Residential Care Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Murdoch House Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Suffolk Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Ashton Good, 0.7 miles away