Ashville Court
- Care home
- 29 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Bradford, Yorkshire and the Humber
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
7 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in March 2026.
7 months
since the latest rating was published.
74 of 102
rated care homes in Bradford are rated Good, like this one.
Ashville Court: inspection record
Rated Good in March 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Westfield Manor Good, 0.2 miles away
- RI Howgate House Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
- G Thornfield House Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Newline Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away
- O Grange Court Residential Home Outstanding, 1.2 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 9 March 2026 (assessment visit 20 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
The assessment was carried out between 11 February 2026 and 23 February 2026.
Ashville Court is a residential care home, supporting up to 29 people who may be living with dementia. At the time of our assessment, 22 people were living at the service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
A routine unannounced inspection took place to review the quality of care and compliance with legal regulations.
The home was very well maintained and provided 3 different lounge areas which were all decorated in different colour schemes and included furniture and accessories appropriate to the general age of the people. There was a positive culture and atmosphere in the home and visitors were always welcomed. People’s food and fluid needs were met and relatives told us their loved ones enjoyed the food. Care plans and risk assessments were detailed, person-centred and regularly reviewed. Medicines were mainly administered safely, although we did highlight some areas for improvement.
The provider made sure there were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff, who received effective support, supervision and development. They worked together to provide safe care which met people’s individual needs. Staff had a good understanding of safeguarding processes and respected people’s wishes. Where people were unable to make their own decisions, they were supported in line with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
People’s care needs were assessed appropriately, and care was delivered in line with people’s care plans.
Staff were very kind and caring. They treated people with dignity and respect. Care and support for people was personalised and tailored to their individual needs and preferences. People were supported to maintain their independence and retain choice and control over their daily lives, as much as possible.
People had end-of-life care plans which detailed the care and support they wanted and needed to make them comfortable, and families were supported to spend time with their loved ones during the last days of their lives.
The management team had a very clear understanding of how to meet people’s needs. They had excellent quality assurance systems in place to ensure oversight of the service and always acted on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes. The provider understood and carried out their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services worked seamlessly for people.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good
This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Wendy Selby
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)15 inspection reports, latest 20 April 2023. Latest assessment published 9 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Ashville Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 04712827 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01274 435400, Monday to Thursday 8.30am to 5pm, Friday 8.30am to 4.30pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Ashville Court provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Ashville Court as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Ashville Court have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 29 beds at Ashville Court.
- When was Ashville Court last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ashville Court was published on 9 March 2026.
- Who runs Ashville Court?
- Ashville Court is run by Ashville Care Limited.
- What is Ashville Court's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 9 March 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01274 613442
- Address
- 58 Sandmoor Garth, Idle, Bradford, BD10 8PN Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Westfield Manor Good, 0.2 miles away
- RI Howgate House Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
- G Thornfield House Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Newline Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away
- O Grange Court Residential Home Outstanding, 1.2 miles away