Rated Care Homes

Haven Nursing Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 9 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 13 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 30 of 153

    rated care homes in Warwickshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Haven Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 70 beds, Warwickshire

Rated Requires improvement in September 2025, down from Good.

Haven Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Hatfield House (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Flexi Coventry Limited (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Hatfield House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Flexi Coventry Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Richmond Village Coventry Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Evergreen Manor Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Arden Croft Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Warwickshire

See all care homes in Ash Green

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 September 2025 (assessment visit 4 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 28 July 2025 to 7 August 2025. Haven Nursing Home is a residential care home providing personal and nursing care for up to 70 older people, some of whom have dementia. At the time of our inspection visit there were 68 people at the home.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was brought forward following a review of the information we held about the service and concerns about the management of clinical risks. We found 2 breaches of the regulations in relation to consent and good governance. The provider had a video and audio surveillance system (CCTV) in communal areas of the home. CCTV in care homes is permissible under specific legal and ethical guidelines. However, the provider had failed to complete a comprehensive appraisal before installing CCTV to ensure compliance with relevant legislation and guidance. This included the Mental Capacity Act 2005, Human Rights Act 1998 and the General Data Protection Regulation. There was no policy to support the use of CCTV and required consents had not been obtained. Associated policies had not been updated and reviewed to reflect use of CCTV in the home. The provider’s audits were not always sufficiently robust to identity areas for improvement in the home. For example, in relation to the oversight and management of accidents and incidents and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

The registered manager was focused on continuous learning and improvement across the service and providing people with person centred care. Oversight of clinical care and medicines management by the registered manager was effective and ensured standards in these areas had been met. Staff described ‘hands on’ leadership with managers working alongside them when guidance or support was needed.

Risks to people’s health and wellbeing had been identified and staff understood their role in mitigating risk. Staff monitored people’s health and wellbeing, and the management team monitored records to ensure care was provided appropriately and safely. Staff described good communication to ensure people received safe, effective care and any changes in need were responded to.

Staff understood their role in escalating issues to ensure people promptly received care and treatment when they needed it. Processes were in place to share information with other healthcare professionals and ensure continuity of care as people moved between services. Health and social care professionals were positive about the benefits to people through effective partnership working.

Staff reflected compassion and empathy when talking about people. They understood the importance of promoting people’s wellbeing by understanding their preferences, routines and individual beliefs and values. Staff promoted people’s independence and sought their consent in their everyday interactions.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to consent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 3 September 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 3 September 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 3 September 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  4. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Louise Jacox
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

14 inspection reports, latest 18 March 2022. Latest assessment published 3 September 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Central England Healthcare (Coventry) LimitedBrand: Central England Healthcare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06063356 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Warwickshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Haven Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Haven Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Haven Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 70 beds at Haven Nursing Home.
When was Haven Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Haven Nursing Home was published on 3 September 2025.
Who runs Haven Nursing Home?
Haven Nursing Home is run by Central England Healthcare (Coventry) Limited.
What is Haven Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 3 September 2025.

Contact

Address
New Road, Ash Green, Coventry, CV7 9AS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Hatfield House (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Flexi Coventry Limited (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Hatfield House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Flexi Coventry Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Richmond Village Coventry Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Evergreen Manor Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Arden Croft Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Warwickshire

See all care homes in Ash Green