Springfield House Residential Care Home
- Care home
- 23 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Polyphant, Cornwall, South West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
First rated Good in 2016, most recently Good in April 2026.
6 months
since the latest rating was published.
149 of 190
rated care homes in Cornwall are rated Good, like this one.
Springfield House Residential Care Home: inspection record
Rated Good in April 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- RI Pen Inney House Requires improvement, 2.6 miles away
- RI Our House Requires improvement, 3.3 miles away
- G Eldon House Residential Home Good, 3.5 miles away
- G No. 18 Good, 3.5 miles away
- G Bowden-Derra Park Good, 3.6 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 April 2026 (assessment visit 9 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 10 and 11 February 2026. Springfield House Residential Care home is a ‘care home’ providing support for a maximum of 23 people. On the day of the assessment, 20 people were living at the service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Staff were kind, compassionate and enjoyed their role caring for people. They told us they were well supported by the acting manager.
Staff were recruited safely and received training relevant to their role.
The service was clean. All necessary checks had been completed to ensure the safety of the environment and equipment.
People received their medication safely.
When potential safeguarding concerns had occurred, prompt referrals to the local authority had not been completed.
Care plans and risk assessments were missing or had not been regularly reviewed to ensure they remained an accurate reflection of people’s needs.
Staff and management did not always work within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). Mental capacity assessments were not consistently completed and those that had been completed were not always accurate.
The provider did not have clear oversight of the service or identify and address areas requiring improvement. Quality monitoring processes did not identify the concerns we found during this assessment.
The provider had not established a good learning culture. Action taken when things went wrong did not mitigate the risk of recurrence.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 14 April 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Mohammad Jahmeerbacus
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)10 inspection reports, latest 30 October 2019. Latest assessment published 14 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Cornish Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 06699496 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Cornwall Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Cornwall Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 1234 131, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday 9am to 5pm, Wednesday 10am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Cornwall Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Springfield House Residential Care Home provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Springfield House Residential Care Home as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Springfield House Residential Care Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 23 beds at Springfield House Residential Care Home.
- When was Springfield House Residential Care Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Springfield House Residential Care Home was published on 14 April 2026.
- Who runs Springfield House Residential Care Home?
- Springfield House Residential Care Home is run by Cornish Care Limited.
- What is Springfield House Residential Care Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 April 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01566 782361
- Address
- North Hill, Hill, Launceston, PL15 7PQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- RI Pen Inney House Requires improvement, 2.6 miles away
- RI Our House Requires improvement, 3.3 miles away
- G Eldon House Residential Home Good, 3.5 miles away
- G No. 18 Good, 3.5 miles away
- G Bowden-Derra Park Good, 3.6 miles away