Rated Care Homes

Long Lea Residential Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 11 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 120 of 153

    rated care homes in Warwickshire are rated Good, like this one.

Long Lea Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 35 beds, Warwickshire

Rated Good in June 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Long Lea Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Tiverton Drive Good, 0.8 miles away
  2. RI
    Allambie Court Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Beaman House Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Glebe Rd Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Warwickshire

See all care homes in Nuneaton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 June 2025 (assessment visit 18 March 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 12 May 2025 to 19 May 2025. Long Lea Residential Home is a care home providing personal care and accommodation for up to 35 adults living with dementia or mental health needs, physical disabilities and sensory loss. At the time of our inspection visit there were 28 people receiving care.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was carried out to follow up on action we told the provider to take at the last assessment. During this assessment we spoke with people who lived at the service, their relatives, staff, the registered manager and sought feedback from other healthcare professionals. We looked at care plans, recruitment files and quality assurance records. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. Improvements were found at this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

Following our last assessment, a new registered manager and a new deputy manager had been appointed. Staff described the positive impact the new management team had on the culture of the home and in promoting positive outcomes for people. Staff told us managers were always available and encouraged them to speak up about concerns and share their feedback about the service. Managers regularly checked the quality and safety of people’s care and where any improvements were identified as being required, plans were developed to address these. The registered manager was proactive in supporting and developing staff learning and practice to ensure the delivery of good standards of care.

There were enough skilled and experienced staff to provide safe and effective care. Staff understood their responsibility to keep people safe and to report any concerns or accidents and incidents that could put people at risk of harm. Potential risks to providing people's care and support had been identified and care plans included the actions staff should take to minimise the risks. Records and our observations confirmed staff worked in accordance with people’s risk management plans.

Processes were in place to ensure actions were taken following any adverse incidents and learning was shared throughout the staff team. The environment was well-maintained, and staff followed good infection control practices. Checks ensured people received their prescribed medicines when they needed them.

People were supported to attend regular healthcare appointments to keep them well and referred to other healthcare professionals when a need was identified. Processes were in place to promote communication as people moved between healthcare providers. People’s nutritional needs were assessed and care plans described what support people needed to maintain their nutritional intake. Staff worked within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and offered people choice and sought their consent before supporting people.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

13 inspection reports, latest 28 October 2023. Latest assessment published 19 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
01987431 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Warwickshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Long Lea Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Long Lea Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Long Lea Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 35 beds at Long Lea Residential Home.
When was Long Lea Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Long Lea Residential Home was published on 19 June 2025.
Who runs Long Lea Residential Home?
Long Lea Residential Home is run by Dwell Limited.
What is Long Lea Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 June 2025.

Contact

Address
113 The Long Shoot, Nuneaton, CV11 6JG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Tiverton Drive Good, 0.8 miles away
  2. RI
    Allambie Court Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Beaman House Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Glebe Rd Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Warwickshire

See all care homes in Nuneaton