Rated Care Homes

Burgess Manor

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 8 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 81 of 106

    rated care homes in Sefton are rated Good, like this one.

Burgess Manor: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 53 beds, Sefton

Rated Good in January 2020, up from Requires improvement.

Burgess Manor: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Elm House Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
  4. RI
    Hesketh Park Lodge Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  5. –
    Manchester House Nursing Home Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Sefton

See all care homes in Southport

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 19 February 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Burgess Manor is a residential care home providing personal and nursing care to 45 people at the time of the inspection. The service is registered to support up to 53 people.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

We found the following examples of good practice.

The home facilitated face to face visits, in line with government guidance. Visiting policies had been updated to reflect the recent changes to government guidance.

The home had a designated visiting area which had its own entrance, this helped keep people safe by minimising traffic within the home. Alternatives to in-person visitation, such as virtual visits, were also supported.

A 'booking in' procedure was in place for visitors to the home including a health questionnaire and evidence of a negative lateral flow test. This helped prevent visitors spreading infection on entering the premises.

The home facilitated people to access the community in a safe way. Staff supported people with the use of risk assessments, PPE and good hand hygiene practices.

Individual COVID-19 risk assessments for people and staff at risk had been completed. This helped mitigate the risks of contracting the virus.

People and staff were tested regularly for COVID-19. Staff employed at the home had been vaccinated, to help keep people safe from the risk of infection. Some staff had received their COVID-19 booster vaccinations.

The home had a team of long standing staff, this helped keep people safe by minimising the need to use staff from external sources, such as agency staff.

Infection control policies and procedures helped ensure that the home adopted best practice which complied with current guidance. The home was clean and hygienic. We noted some chipped and damaged paintwork in the communal corridors which could prevent effective cleaning, however, this had already been identified by the registered manager. Plans were in place to continue refurbishing parts of the home.

The home employed full time domestic staff. Cleaning schedules and audits were in place to help maintain cleanliness and minimise the spread of infection.

The home comprised of four units, meaning that during times of a COVID-19 outbreak, any people who were COVID-19 positive could be cared for separately from those with a negative status.

Staff were trained and competent in infection prevention and control best practices and how to put on and take off PPE. The home had adequate supplies of appropriate PPE. Staff had a designated area of the home where they could change into their uniforms and put on PPE before each shift. A COVID-19 policy file was in place which provided staff with up to date guidance.

The registered manager maintained links with external health professionals to enable people to receive the care and intervention they needed. Virtual consultations took place as and when necessary.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Emma Patterson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

14 inspection reports, latest 19 February 2022. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Newco Southport LimitedBrand: Venturi Healthcare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03164633 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Sefton Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Burgess Manor provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Burgess Manor as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Burgess Manor have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 53 beds at Burgess Manor.
When was Burgess Manor last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Burgess Manor was published on 23 January 2020.
Who runs Burgess Manor?
Burgess Manor is run by Newco Southport Limited.
What is Burgess Manor's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 23 January 2020.