Rated Care Homes

Greene House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in February 2020.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 78 of 113

    rated care homes in Buckinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

Greene House: inspection record

Care home, 10 beds, Buckinghamshire

Rated Good in February 2020.

Greene House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Micholl's House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Morton House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Queen Elizabeth House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. RI
    Russell House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Woodland Manor Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away

See all care homes in Buckinghamshire

See all care homes in Horn Hill

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 14 February 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Greene House is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal and nursing care to younger and older adults. The service provides specialist care to people with epilepsy and support for people who may also have a learning disability, autism, mental health condition or dementia.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Greene House is situated within a larger campus style setting owned and operated by the Epilepsy Society. Inside the campus, there are other registered care homes, communal facilities such as a recreation hall and coffee shop, community based healthcare professionals and the provider's head office.

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

The service was a large home, bigger than most domestic style properties. It was registered for the support of up to 14 people. Eleven people were using the service. This is larger than current best practice guidance. However, the size of the service having a negative impact on people was mitigated by the building design fitting into the residential area and the other large domestic homes of a similar size. There were deliberately no identifying signs (apart from the house name), intercom, cameras or anything else outside to indicate it was a care home. Staff were also discouraged from wearing anything that suggested they were care staff when coming and going with people.

What inspectors found

People were protected from abuse, neglect and discrimination. Most people's risk assessments were thorough and up-to-date and contained relevant information to ensure risks were mitigated as far as possible. Risks related to the premises were assessed and managed. There were enough staff deployed, albeit an ongoing vacancy pattern for care workers. The building was clean and tidy. Risks related to chemicals were not mitigated and needed action to reduce risks to people and others. However, the registered manager acted to negate the risks following the inspection and provided evidence.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People's likes, preferences and dislikes were considered and used in their everyday care. Staff had a good knowledge of people's needs. People received enough food and drinks to prevent malnutrition and dehydration. People's care was joined up with local and community-based health and social care professionals. The service was compliant with the provisions set out by the Mental Capacity Act 2005. There was a recent redecoration of the property, with some changes to the building layout. Staff had the necessary knowledge, skills and experience to support people.

The staff were kind and compassionate. People were satisfied with the support they received and told us they liked living at Greene House. People's rights were respected, and their dignity and privacy maintained. Where possible, people's independence was promoted. People were involved in their care planning and reviews.

Support plans were person-centred, detailed and contemporaneous. The daily notes were satisfactory. Most of the daily progress notes was task-based and not person-centred; the registered manager accepted this feedback. We made a recommendation about signage within the building to meet the minimum requirements set out in the NHS Accessible Information Standard. There was a satisfactory complaints mechanism in place. There was good planning and care for people's end of life care.

The provider had a clear and credible charter of people's rights, which were respected at Greene House. There was a positive workplace environment. Audits and other quality assurance processes were used to gauge, monitor and report on the quality and safety of care. Appropriate actions were taken when issues were identified. The registered manager and deputy manager are knowledgeable, skilled and experienced and were able to lead the service well. There is good linked up working with the organisation and local community. The service showed transparency and accountability in reporting matters when things went wrong.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Stephen Potter
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 14 February 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
00492761 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
206186

Epilepsy Society runs 7 services, all in the South East. 6 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Epilepsy Society

  1. G
    Croft Cottage Good. Care home, Buckinghamshire
  2. G
    Micholl's House Good. Care home, Buckinghamshire
  3. G
    Morton House Good. Care home, Buckinghamshire
  4. G
    Queen Elizabeth House Good. Care home with nursing, Buckinghamshire

See all 7 services run by Epilepsy Society

Getting help from Buckinghamshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Greene House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Greene House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Greene House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 10 beds at Greene House.
When was Greene House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Greene House was published on 14 February 2020.
Who runs Greene House?
Greene House is run by Epilepsy Society. It runs 7 services, all in the South East.
What is Greene House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 February 2020.

Contact

Phone
01494 601426
Address
Chesham Lane, Chalfont St. Peter, Gerrards Cross, SL9 0RJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Micholl's House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Morton House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Queen Elizabeth House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. RI
    Russell House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Woodland Manor Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away

See all care homes in Buckinghamshire

See all care homes in Horn Hill